Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 3,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Feb 2008, 2:25 pm
" RCA v. [read post]
18 Apr 2020, 5:54 pm
This doesn’t seem fair does it? [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:00 am
Not only does he disagree with the "never apologize" rule, he urges just the opposite. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 1:50 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: The end of William Patry’s blog: (Patry Copyright Blog), (Excess Copyright), (Patently-O), (Chicago IP Litigation Blog), (Michael Geist), (The Fire of Genius), (Techdirt), (Patry Copyright Blog), Kitchin J clarifies scope of biotech patents, in particular gene sequence patents: Eli Lilly & Co v Human Genome Sciences:… [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:37 am
See Hillary Oran, Does Brady Have Byte? [read post]
1 Jan 2010, 5:49 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Mezey v. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 9:34 am
Lubin, 122 F. 240 (1903).See Mazer v. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:43 am
One telling omission from Gorsuch’s opinion is his failure, despite recounting a mountain of precedent, to mention a fundamental pillar of arbitration law that was articulated by Justice Harry Blackmun in Mitsubishi Motors v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm
. those who contend that it does not benefit African Americans to . [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm
Evan Harris also condemned these changes as “all “press release” and no “press regulation,” and questioned why IPSO did not consult the public over these changes “and instead negotiated in secret with a secretive industry body. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 8:16 am
So how does that warrant a title of “billion-dollar lawyer”? [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 4:05 am
It is important to emphasize, therefore, just how unprecedented that challenge is—and the potentially profound impact it could have on countless federal spending programs if the Court were to embrace it.It has long been accepted, without a whisper of any constitutional doubt, that “[a]lthough participation in the Medicaid program is entirely optional, once a State elects to participate, it must comply with the requirements of the [Act],” Harris v. [read post]
21 Nov 2011, 1:50 pm
, 115 PENN STATE LAW REVIEW 341 (2010)Marc Edelman, Does the NBA still have “market power? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 9:01 pm
University of Texas and its 2003 decision in Grutter v. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 10:50 am
A short excerpt from today's long decision by Judge Trevor McFadden (D.D.C.) in Newman v. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:03 am
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm
Last week, in Halbig v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 8:48 am
In RSL Funding, LLC v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 8:02 am
Path. et al. v. [read post]
