Search for: "In Re: Designation of Judges"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 9,831
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
But if you’re unfamiliar with the intricacies of the process, it’s easy to become overwhelmed and even discouraged. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
But if you’re unfamiliar with the intricacies of the process, it’s easy to become overwhelmed and even discouraged. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:57 am
But if you’re unfamiliar with the intricacies of the process, it’s easy to become overwhelmed and even discouraged. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 9:05 am
And Professor Andrews was just a dreamer talking about patents he deemed superstrong, but if a judge--such as patent-savvy Judge Koh--had handed down a claim construction after a defendant making the case for narrow interpretation, and if they had been challenged like the 23 Qualcomm patents that came under pressure just over the last 9 or 10 days, the result would be sobering. [read post]
25 Jan 2019, 3:54 am
Two of the Section 2(d) decisions were precedential, involving the marks I'M SMOKING HOT and AMERICAN CONSTELLATION: In re FabFitFun, Inc., 127 USPQ2d 1670 (TTAB 2018) [precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
24 Jan 2019, 2:36 pm
Stark calls on the country’s political leaders to end the stalemate and re-open the government, including the SEC. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:14 pm
If the parties have a novel coverage argument that they are considering eventually presenting to a judge or arbitration panel, the mediator can provide important feedback to help the parties gauge the likely receptivity of an eventual judge or arbitrator to a particular issue. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 8:59 am
Guest Blog Post by Tyler Ochoa [This is part 2 of a 2-part series on the Music Modernization Act. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 7:26 am
" In re Gillard, Serial No. 87469115 (January 11, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Christopher Larkin).The term "covfefe" was born on May 31, 2017, when President Trump tweeted "Despite the constant negative press covfefe. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 7:15 am
In re Starbucks Corporation, Serial Nos. 85792872 (left) and 86689423 (right) (January 17, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Michael B. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 2:30 am
None of the appealed cases led to judges reversing convictions, nor has evidence emerged to show that the defendants were innocent. [read post]
20 Jan 2019, 11:43 pm
They acquire their authority because the judges continue to agree that this is what is meant. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 3:23 am
[Answer in first comment].In re Iron Balls International, Serial No. 87299536 (January 16, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Albert Zervas) [Section 2(d) refusal to register the mark IRON BALLS ENGINEERED ALCOHOL & Design for "gin" [ENGINEERED ALCOHOL disclaimed] in view of the registered mark IRON BALLS for "beer"].In re Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, LLC, Serial No. 87042698 (January 15, 2019) [not precedential]… [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Having candidates complete a work assignment is a good way to judge their potential without considering race, gender, or other diversity factors. [read post]
18 Jan 2019, 2:00 am
Having candidates complete a work assignment is a good way to judge their potential without considering race, gender, or other diversity factors. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 11:09 pm
You're convinced that you're right but no one else agrees! [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:12 pm
When one drives towards the South Texas border, many say they’re driving to the “Valley. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
The results of this poll express a mix of expectations that chiefly appear to depend on whether Trump is re-elected. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 10:06 am
The existing provision in s. 115A of the Australian Copyright Act has been considered by the Federal Court of Australia in Television Broadcasts Limited v Telstra Corporation Limited[2018] FCA 1434[6].The Committee may also wish to look at recent UK jurisprudence concerning website blocking, which is based upon s. 97A of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 of the UK.[7]The Australian and UK jurisprudence are important reference points because they feature the involvement of superior… [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 11:00 am
A concurring judge wrote to highlight two questions. [read post]
