Search for: "In re Ring"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,662
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2011, 5:37 am
” just didn't have the same ring to it. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 8:52 pm
… your buddy approaches and and is nice enough to report that he found your wedding ring on the floor. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 pm
In re Arnold G. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 4:18 pm
Same result, the court said, for intentional misrepresentation by a co-insured -- bango, you're both done. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:55 pm
See In re Alstom SA Sec. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:58 am
Check out the equipment (Are the life rings and reaching poles close by? [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 3:32 pm
Ask the Tooth Fairy, son.The phone’s been ringing off the hook here at the Circumcision Law Desk all weekend, so I apologize in advance if this post comes off sounding a bit distracted. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 10:17 am
Business identity theft Identity theft rings have recently begun to target small to middle size businesses that typically have larger lines of credit than individuals. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 4:14 am
” [via the Missouri Supreme Court’s Clerk’s Office’s summary] State, ex re. [read post]
5 Jun 2011, 10:05 am
Do I Get to Keep the Wedding Ring, Part II I previously blogged about the wedding ring issue , but I'm going to try it again, and this time I'll try to make it more direct. 1)You wi... [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:13 pm
If you’re presently working, you may be able to file for Chapter 13. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 3:33 am
Briefs and other papers for these cases may be found at TTABVUE via the links provided.June 14, 2011 - 10 AM: In re Collen IP Intellectual Property Law, P.C., Serial Nos. 77513758 and 77513717 [Section 2(e)(1) refusals to register A BRAND NAME ADVISOR for "business consultation services, namely, product and marketing evaluation; advertising services, namely, creating corporate and product identity for others; creating trademarks for others" and A BRAND NAME LAW FIRM for… [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 1:44 am
At trial the basis of the Crown case – one of the ‘keys’ of its circumstantial case – was the re-appearance of the deceased’s rings on 7th May 1998, some time after she had gone missing, some eight or nine days previously. [read post]
31 May 2011, 3:19 pm
I will not be disappointed at all if the two of them get another ring. [read post]
31 May 2011, 12:50 pm
All members serve for a term of three (3) years and may be re-appointed. [read post]
29 May 2011, 5:20 pm
So, since its become clear that bankers lie, and cannot be trusted, we’re going to need to bring back the old laws about having to prove you’re the right party to be foreclosing on someone’s home before you’re allowed to do so. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:37 am
It's not that they're looking for a free ride, as much as there being no other ride available to them. [read post]
28 May 2011, 10:55 am
I think many, probably most, nose jobs would fail because they’re insufficiently original to merit copyright protection. [read post]
28 May 2011, 3:28 am
Arguments of judicial independence ring silly and empty when federal judges themselves opine that they're "literally speechless. [read post]
27 May 2011, 10:28 am
Protip: if your conduct of your client’s affairs requires you to make a statement reassuring the media that you are not per se opposed to large breasts, you’re doing it wrong. [read post]
