Search for: "MARSHALL v. MARSHALL" Results 3001 - 3020 of 6,382
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
Justice Marshall Rothstein http://t.co/VfjMCjUqTR -> UKIPO report on 3D printing lacks dimension http://t.co/Z9JMAGbRnh -> The 3 Most Common Plagiarism Excuses I Hear http://t.co/DV3vt0IFJ1 -> Don't ask if artists deserve to be paid. http://t.co/ufKehicBiB -> Open Letter to Congress re Protection of Fundamental IP Rights http://t.co/wVBPAmVwGY -> Are food recipes protected by copyright? [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Lemley (Stanford Law School) Lawrence Lessig (Harvard Law School) Raizel Liebeler (John Marshall Law School) Barry P. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 10:35 am by Guest Blogger
Timothy Jost On January 28, 2015, thirty amicus briefs were filed in the Supreme Court supporting the validity of the Internal Revenue Service rule in King v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 12:23 pm by Andrew Silver
  Although premised on mere statutory interpretation, the opinion in Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:28 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  Typically they have been denied without dissent or comment, since the obstinate Justices Brennan and Marshall retired. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:47 am by Amy Howe
MacLean, in which the Court ruled in favor of an air marshal turned whistleblower. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
United States Supreme Court distinguishes a law from a regulation for the purposes the federal whistle blower statute Department of Homeland Security v MacLean, USSC #13-984 A federal air marshal publicly disclosed that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) had decided to cut costs by removing air marshals from certain flights. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 4:56 am by Amy Howe
MacLean, in which the Court ruled for a federal air marshal turned whistleblower, focusing on the dissent by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Anthony Kennedy. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 6:27 am by Joy Waltemath
Justice Sotomayor, with whom Justice Kennedy joined, dissented (Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
23 Jan 2015, 5:53 am
Earlier this week, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in DHS v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:02 am
“The analysis is a balancing act,” wrote Rothstein in a 6-1 ruling in Tervita Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 9:00 am by Jason M. Knott
Last November, we covered the Supreme Court oral argument in the case of Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]