Search for: "Matter of G. C. ,"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 4,013
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2011, 11:04 am
(g)? [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
G 3/08 [10.13.2]) these cannot contribute to inventive step. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 3:03 am
[G]overnment cannot improve on market outcomes, as they have neither the necessary information nor the incentives.... [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 10:07 am
For example, in Matter of Stuart, 22 A.D.3d 131 (2nd Dept. 2003) a prosecutor was suspended for deceiving the Court about the existence of Brady material and the attorney Disciplinary Rules quite specifically require prosecutors to make such disclosures. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:17 am
The cases of Ambrose, G and M deal with various challenges that have arisen since the ruling in Cadder v HM Advocate. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 5:03 pm
Creative contends that the '373 Patent is invalid under § 102(g)(2) because of Creative's prior invention. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 10:33 am
The court reasoned that the certification at issue in this case – blood draw results in a DWI matter – represented more than a machine-generated number, but rather the fact that the analyst had received Mr. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 9:10 am
§ 1553(c)(1)(A)(ii). [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 3:00 am
(c) A single fixed compact camera shall be installed inconspicuously inside the courtroom to provide a single wide-angle full-view of the sala of the trial court. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:33 am
” A1 and A2 were found to infringe, but the B to G devices were not. [read post]
25 Jun 2011, 4:55 am
Lewis & Art C. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 5:27 pm
C. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
NOTE: This Blog/Blawg, NJ Family Issues, is managed by Paul G. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm
As to the required substantiation of the ground(s) of opposition, the function of R 55(c) EPC 1973 (now R 76(2)(c)) is, inter alia, to establish the legal and factual framework within which the substantive examination of the opposition is in principle to be conducted, thereby giving the patentee a fair chance to consider his position at an early stage of the proceedings (see G 9/91). [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
Article 4(3) provides that, notwithstanding Article 4, paragraph 2(b) and Article 4, paragraph 2(c) as it relates to paragraph 2(b), extradition shall not be granted if the executive authority of the Requested State determines that the request was politically motivated. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 12:04 pm
§ 766 cmt. g. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:40 am
Stadlen J, giving the main judgment in the Divisional Court, deals first with the Claimant’s submission that the FTPP’s decision was contrary to natural justice and unlawful as a matter of common law. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 2:13 pm
Code § 21167(c).) [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm
For requests made by the United Kingdom to the United States, evidence sufficient to meet the probable cause standard will still be required, as set forth in article 8(3)(c) of the new Treaty and under applicable U.S. case law. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 9:31 am
`(g) Exception for Theft or Fraud- It shall not be unlawful under this chapter for a person acting under color of law to intercept geolocation information pertaining to the location of another person who has unlawfully taken the device sending the geolocation information if– `(1) the owner or operator of such device authorizes the interception of the person’s geolocation information; `(2) the person acting under color of law is lawfully engaged in an… [read post]
