Search for: "Reading v. Attorney General" Results 3001 - 3020 of 14,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2021, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “Concerning Judiciary Law §487, it is well settled that to establish such a cause of action the plaintiff must present evidence an attorney acted “with intent to deceive” either the court or any party (see, Moormann v. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 12:02 pm by Karen Gullo
The Ninth Circuit said California’s disclosure requirement posed minimal First Amendment harms because the Attorney General must keep the donor names confidential. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 3:35 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In 2014. the Attorney General’s office (‘”AG”) began an investigation of the Lutheran All Faiths Cemetery (the “Cemetery”). [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 2:22 pm by Daniel Schwartz
Sec. 53a-157b which she argued outlines a general policy against making false statements with the intent to deceive. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:47 am by Florian Mueller
Cobb (enabling app developers to complain to Arizona's Attorney General about any failure by Apple or Google to comply) was adopted. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 11:37 am
  Citing to both CA §4-602 (Involuntary dissolution) and CA §4-603 (Avoidance of dissolution by purchase of petitioner’s stock), the Court made four general observations. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Scott and Donna Ruscitti
The bill grants enforcement authority to the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and state attorneys general, but, significantly, does not include a private right of action. [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 4:00 am by Ian Mackenzie
Canada (Attorney General), 2020 FCA 25 at paragraphs 12-13). [read post]
3 Mar 2021, 3:43 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the attorney ‘failed to exercise the ordinary reasonable skill and knowledge commonly possessed by a member of the legal profession’ and that the attorney’s breach of this duty proximately caused plaintiff to sustain actual and ascertainable damages” (Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d 438, 442, quoting McCoy v… [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 9:40 am by Josh H. Escovedo and Zack Thompson
Supreme Court issued numerous landmark decisions in 2020, among those—for trademark scholars and practitioners—Romag Fasteners, Inc. v. [read post]