Search for: "Scalia v. United States" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,639
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2012, 12:41 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Greenwood, --- S.Ct. ----, 2012 WL 43514 (1/10/12) the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) considered whether the Credit Repair Organizations Act (CROA), 15 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Jan 2012, 12:37 pm by David Lat
Thomas [Supreme Court of the United States via SCOTUSblog] Maples v. [read post]
14 Jan 2012, 9:00 am by Alan Horowitz
Introduction Depending on how the Court resolves a threshold issue, United States v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 4:25 pm by admin
”  As Justice Scalia elaborated in his dissenting opinion in Hamdi v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 7:12 am by Marissa Miller
Raich, an opinion joined by Justice Scalia. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 6:25 am
United States Environmental Protection Agency, No. 10-1062. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 10:22 am by Bill Otis
  The theory that brought about this result became an instant icon, of sorts, with the defense bar, and was even noted by Justice Scalia years later in the oral argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 2:21 pm
Justice Ginsburg went right at it by saying to Solicitor General of the United States Donald Verrilli... [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 11:34 am by Adam Wahlberg
[Backgrounder: in a ruling issued April 28, 2009, the United States Supreme Court ruled to uphold the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) fleeting expletive rule.[12] The court reversed a lower court ruling in the 2nd U.S. [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 12:08 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
Stewart, if you related the facts of this case as they come to us to an ordinary homeowner, don’t you think most ordinary homeowners would say this kind of thing can’t happen in the United States? [read post]
9 Jan 2012, 8:24 am by Lyle Denniston
  The Court thus made clear that its deeply controversial ruling of two years ago, in Citizens United v. [read post]