Search for: "Sellers v. State" Results 3001 - 3020 of 3,701
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Dec 2020, 4:02 pm by Cory Doctorow
The rules for initiating investigations are set out in Chapter IV and the enforcement rules are in Chapter V. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 6:49 pm by Chuck Cosson
While Microsoft has stated it’s extending this offer on the basis few claims are likely to succeed,[21] it also indicates that Microsoft believes there will be some claims that survive to settlement or even to judgment, and for which it would be optimal for Microsoft to control the litigation (rather than its customer). [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 8:41 am by Stephen E. Sachs
Wayfair, the 2018 case which lets states force out-of-state sellers to collect and remit use taxes. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
There are no duties owed between buyer and seller except, put simply, to be honest, fair, and legal. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by stevemehta
Filed 3/29/11 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION THREE JSM TUSCANY, LLC et al., Petitioners, v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Guida, No. 05-6105 In death penalty habeas proceedings in a case in which petitioner effectuated a murder-for-hire against her husband, denial of habeas relief is affirmed where: 1) state courts reasonably applied Strickland by concluding that petitioner sabotaged her own defense, as counsel's performance is not deficient when counsel follows a client's instructions; 2) state courts reasonably applied Brady because even if certain letters were favorable evidence, and were… [read post]