Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court" Results 3001 - 3020 of 9,084
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2013, 8:25 pm by Kirk Jenkins
On Wednesday, the United States Supreme Court handed down its opinion in another of this term’s major class action cases. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:06 am by Jonathan H. Adler
The district court dismissed the statutory claims, see Doe I v. [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am by Bernard Bell
  The Court “assume[d] without deciding that the first factor would weigh in Vaz’s favor. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 8:04 am
Del Pizzo, III and Maryland District Court Judge Emanuel Brown. [read post]
31 Jul 2006, 8:04 am
Del Pizzo, III and Maryland District Court Judge Emanuel Brown. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 11:42 am by Robinson, Calcagnie & Robinson
National Credit Acceptance, Inc., (First District, June 25, 2009) 175 Cal.App.4th 324, 95 Cal.Rptr.3d 880, 09 Cal. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 9:25 am
EOG Resources, Inc., Cause No. 2011-27476, in the 11th Judicial District Court of Harris County. [read post]
17 May 2021, 8:31 am by Joel R. Brandes
 The district court observed that “The grave-risk exception is found in Article 13 of the Hague Convention, which states that: the judicial ... authority of the requested State is not bound to order the return of the child if the person ... which opposes its return establishes that ... there is a grave risk that his or her return would expose the child to physical or psychological harm or otherwise place the child in an intolerable situation. [read post]
1 Jul 2019, 8:59 am by Kevin Goldberg
The Argus Leader availed itself of the right to judicial review under FOIA, successfully filing suit in the United States District Court for the District of South Dakota. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 8:06 am by Christopher Walker
The Hobbs Act, he explained, “is just an ordinary judicial review statute” that should not “divest the district court of the authority to decide the question on the basis of the statute and its interpretation. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:08 pm by Robert D. Forbes
Recently, the federal district court in Ibey v. [read post]
30 May 2019, 8:11 am by John Elwood
The district court dismissed ESN’s complaint, but the U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 6:54 am
However, the Eleventh pointed out, a substantive due process right to DNA testing was expressly rejected by the Supreme Court in 2009’s District Attorney’s Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 3:27 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Schertenleib was relied upon by a federal district court in dismissing a §487 claim based upon a restraining order obtained from a federal district court in Florida, stating that "Section 487 only applies to conduct within the borders of New York State" (see Papworth v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 12:25 pm by Lawrence Solum
In December 2017, a federal district court held that Delaware’s partisan balance regime violates the First Amendment’s freedom-of-association guarantee because it discriminates among judicial candidates based on party affiliation. [read post]
18 Jul 2020, 4:35 pm by INFORRM
Leopold v US No.18-5276, an investigative court reporter applied to the district court to unseal various court orders relating to electronic surveillance. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 4:00 am by Schachtman
ED107476, Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District (St. [read post]