Search for: "Taylor v. Taylor" Results 3001 - 3020 of 4,755
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The court initially considers if the subject of the claim sought to be arbitrated is the type authorized by Civil Service Law Article 14 [the Taylor Law] and is not barred by constitutional, statutory or public policy considerations, the first test. [read post]
21 Aug 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
., dismissal was “so disproportionate to the offense, in the light of all the circumstances, as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness,” [see Pell v Board of Education, 34 NY2d 222],  it probably would have directed Plaintiff's reinstatement with all, or a portion, of her back salary.* A collective bargaining agreement negotiated pursuant to Article 14 of the Civil Service Law, the so-called Taylor Law, may provide for an alternative to this statutory… [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 9:43 am
Fortunately, the Delaware Chancery Court recently issued a decision, entitled Edgewater Growth Capital Partners, L.P. v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 1:00 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
First Letter Last Name Division / Judge Floor Courtroom G, 0, S, U    Division A — Greco   2nd   20   B, F, P    Division B — Myers   1st Floor   12   D, M, N, X, Y    Division C — Farr   2nd   24   C, K, R    Division D — Lefler   2nd   23   H, L, W    Division E — Taylor   2nd   22   A, E, J, I, Q, T,… [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that in the absence of a Taylor Law contract providing otherwise, a municipality’s past practice does not demonstrate any right to compel the municipality to continue providing the same level of health benefits to its retirees as it has in the past.The decision is posted on the Internet… [read post]
12 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
As the Court of Appeals held in Cassidy v Municipal Civil Service Commission of City of New Rochelle, 37 N.Y.2d 526, Civil Service Law §61(1) grants the appointing authority broad discretion in the selection of candidates, including that of appointing a lower-scoring candidate over a higher-scoring one. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 9:11 am by The Public Employment Law Press
No private right of action flows from a mere statement of general policy applicable to all Civil Service employeesMatter of Subway Surface Supervisors Assn. v New York City Tr. [read post]
22 May 2017, 6:27 am
The KitKat KatIt will not have escaped readers that last week the Court of Appeal handed down its decision in Nestlé v Cadbury [2017] EWCA Civ 358, ie the KitKat trade mark dispute. [read post]
17 Aug 2019, 5:06 am by Vishnu Kannan
David Priess and Margaret Taylor addressed the recent confusion over impeachment proceedings. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 6:57 am by Mikhaila Fogel
Eliot Kim summarized the Supreme Court’s ruling in Jam v. [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 11:32 am by Molly E. Reynolds
The bill’s inclusion in the omnibus is particularly notable because lawmakers were facing a ticking clock: The CLOUD Act, if passed, would moot the upcoming Supreme Court decision on cross-border data access in United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 9:08 am
  Claire Methven O'Brien and I are delighted to announce that Human Rights Due Diligence Laws: From Due Diligence Standards to New Legal Norms will be published by Routledge (Taylor & Francis Group) in their Globalization: Law and Policy Series. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:28 am
 In this note, occasional guest blogger Paul England (senior associate, Taylor Wessing, and definitely not a shark) gives us the low-down on a recent fairly economical patent dispute in which the only things inflated were the products made by the respective parties. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
A showing that a pending arbitration’s award may be rendered ineffectual and there is a likelihood of success is critical to obtaining a preliminary injunctionPatrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of the City of New York, Inc. v City of New York,2013 NY Slip Op 08033, Appellate Division, First DepartmentThree members [Petitioners] of the Patrolmen's Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc. [read post]