Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 3001 - 3020
of 9,166
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Feb 2024, 4:09 pm
Nothing in the post-2013 Act case law suggests that the section 3(3) requirement is any less permissive (see, for example, the first instance decision in Butt v Secretary of State [2017] EWHC 2619 (QB), and particularly Mr Justice Nicol’s comments at [39]. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 1:27 pm
United States EPA, 2015 U.S. [read post]
24 Sep 2023, 4:05 am
[T]he animating principle in New York Times v. [read post]
28 Jun 2016, 9:38 am
United States do not fall within federal laws designed to ensure that officeholders provide “honest services. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 3:46 am
Corp. v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:46 am
The idea of negotiating an international treaty to fight in an urgent way the worldwide increasing piracy and counterfeiting is attributed to the United States and Japan. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:49 am
"Liberals" in the United States don't like to talk about the wealth-transfer aspect because they understand that once you call something a wealth transfer program, it fails. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:55 am
This can be true `whether under a search warrant or a subpoena duces tecum. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 11:59 am
” So the Justices also pressed Deputy Solicitor General Malcolm Stewart, who argued on behalf of the United States, to articulate a rule that would spare cloud computing from liability. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 6:39 am
Some more from Justice Brennan in Garrison v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 4:30 am
United States, the Court held that the commerce clause power was plenary and not subject to non-textual limitations of state sovereignty. [read post]
21 Jul 2013, 1:57 pm
United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 8:51 am
United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555-56, 114 S. [read post]
14 Apr 2022, 11:39 am
United States, 567 U.S. 387, 401 (2012). [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 6:55 pm
United States that some standard needed to be created for what constitutes a "violent felony," this case is the proper vehicle for setting that standard. [read post]
Will the Real Evidence-Based Ebola Policy Please Stand Up? Seven Takeaways From Maine DHHS v. Hickox
6 Nov 2014, 8:44 am
The case I mentioned in my last post, Maine Department of Health and Human Services v. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:44 am
Code § 230(b), Congress articulated the "specific policies" behind the adoption of the CDA: `It is the policy of the United States— (1) to promote the continued development of the Internet and other interactive computer services and other interactive media; (2) to preserve the vibra [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 4:29 pm
Blakeney endorsed the Third Circuit’s articulation of this concept in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2007, 3:15 am
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
