Search for: "**u.s. v. Davis"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 3,265
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 May 2022, 4:16 am
OTHER U.S. [read post]
12 May 2020, 9:00 pm
Do South Dakota v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 8:00 am
Eckerhart, 461 U.S. 424 (1983) (“the [significant issues] test is whether the party ‘succeeded on any significant issue in litigation which achieves some of the benefit the parties sought in bringing suit. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 6:03 am
The U.S. [read post]
10 May 2021, 7:25 am
Prior to the Supreme Court’s decision in INS v. [read post]
26 Dec 2011, 9:28 pm
This is one of a continuing series of articles the blog has been publishing in recent weeks, explaining more fully the new federal health care law, and the Supreme Court’s review of the constitutionality of key parts of the law. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm
Panelists: Bill Hearn, Davis LLP Canadian SCt decided Richard v. [read post]
24 Jul 2011, 6:12 pm
The AmeriKat was interested to note that this year USPTO Director David Kappos gave a Commencement address at UC-Davis's College of Engineering graduation (picture, left - David Kappos giving his speech). [read post]
14 May 2012, 7:22 am
And the case recently offered up by Henry Davis strikes close to home. [read post]
16 Sep 2021, 9:01 pm
Today, September 17, is known as “Constitution Day,” the day chosen by Congress to celebrate the U.S. [read post]
25 May 2017, 1:08 pm
Davis, 533 U.S. 678, 695 (2001), and that it is the judiciary’s responsibility to uphold those limitations…. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 6:05 am
DoD’s Law of War Manual, § 15.4.2; the current availability of which is contested, see Bothe ¶ 28; Davis). [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 7:45 am
Ogden, 22 U.S. (9 Wheat.) 1, 197 (1824). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 6:06 pm
Jenkins, and Richlin Security Service Co. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 3:23 pm
Aug. 31, 2012), sent to us by Janelle Davis of Thompson & Knight, although we must admit Romero does have its moments.Romero evaluates a variety of claims purportedly arising under Texas law, in the wake of the big win in Centocor, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm
Rahman Ford writes on stem cell therapy policy Two years ago, the U.S. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 12:36 pm
Goldstein, 2017 U.S. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 10:43 am
In United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2016, 6:21 pm
See generally Ferens v. [read post]
