Search for: "50 Doe Defendants"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 7,316
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2009, 10:04 pm
The defendants submit that the costs awarded in favour of the plaintiff ought to be reduced by 50% to reflect the court's finding on liability. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
“Qualified immunity” shields government officials (sued in their “personal capacity”) from liability in these suits “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
That helped defendants, but not much, in warning claims since when warnings are adequate, defendants win anyway. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:18 pm
Procedural Background It is worth noting that this case does not include alleged violations of the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (“CFAA”), the most commonly applied federal law to web scraping. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
But "maybe" there's $50 million in fake revenue. [read post]
19 May 2016, 11:04 am
This should include defending landowners in future lawsuits and compensating them for legal damages incurred because of the wind farm. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 1:25 pm
Should These be Categorized as Title 50 “Covert Action”? [read post]
20 Mar 2014, 11:08 am
An advertisement can be confusing without being memorable; a defendant does not escape liability under the Lanham Act merely because his advertisement is not memorable. [read post]
19 Sep 2022, 12:12 pm
Contra the FTC’s position on claims like “environmentally friendly,” the court further held: “Nor can defendant be held responsible for a host of possible, even if potentially reasonable, consumer beliefs about the meaning of ‘All Natural. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 10:36 am
However, this does not render Levine’s appeal ineffective. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 4:34 pm
" Anderson, 477 U.S. at 249-50 (citations omitted). [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 6:28 am
Since 488's negative definition of petty theft is no longer the sole statement of what petty theft is, prosecutors may be able to charge petty theft violations as a violation of 490.2 rather than as a violation of 484(a) - 488.Section 490.2 admittedly does not define what "theft" means -- and prosecutors would at least need to keep section 484(a) in mind in order to state what it means for someone to have carried out the theft of goods. [read post]
19 Jan 2021, 5:20 pm
Nor does it have any application to state laws governing independent contractor versus employee status. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
In August 1994, Craig entered into a $50 million revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 12:48 pm
In August 1994, Craig entered into a $50 million revolving credit agreement with a consortium of banks. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 6:00 am
The court explained that G.S. 15A-974(a)(2) “does not provide a mechanism by which [the defendant] could allege evidence was obtained as a result of a substantial violation of Chapter 15. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Codair’s co-defendants are Brian Connor, 50, of Arlington; Jonathan Kulis, 37, of Wilmington; Michael McPherson, 38, of Billerica; and Brian O’Connor, 39, of Woburn. [read post]
30 May 2023, 1:24 pm
Modified comparative fault sets a bar rate of 50 or 51 percent; however, it does not bar an injured party from compensation for being partly to blame. [read post]
29 Jan 2019, 2:51 pm
Concorde Investment Services teaches that the size of the class simply does not matter under SLUSA. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 6:00 am
Codair’s co-defendants are Brian Connor, 50, of Arlington; Jonathan Kulis, 37, of Wilmington; Michael McPherson, 38, of Billerica; and Brian O’Connor, 39, of Woburn. [read post]
