Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 19,711
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2008, 6:46 am
Supreme Court said a few years ago in Clark County Schools v. [read post]
5 Apr 2013, 2:30 pm
The genesis of this issue dealt with the case of Villanueva v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 3:32 pm
State in 2015 and ... [read post]
23 May 2023, 9:41 am
As more states continue to pass restrictive abortion laws, a recent report found that since Roe v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 11:58 am
Yosemite Avenue, Manteca, CA 95337 * 338 McHenry Avenue, Modesto, CA 95354 * 3833 McHenry Avenue, Modesto, CA 95356 * 1420 V Street, Merced, CA 95340 * 2651 Greer Road, Turlock, CA 95382 The State is attempting to suspend the licenses of these stores. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 5:42 pm
Beating me to the punch, on Slate.com: Mapp v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 8:20 am
The cert petition in Maples v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 11:15 am
Salazar (disenrollment)* State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/currentstate.htmCases featured: People ex rel. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 1:07 pm
As a result, the billing of CPT 99050 and CPT 99051 has led to a number of State investigations and audits of these codes. [read post]
25 Jan 2023, 4:10 am
On January 19, the Indiana Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Members of the Medical Licensing Board of Indiana, et al. v. [read post]
4 Apr 2007, 7:25 am
The most notorious example of this is the United States Supreme Court's decision in Buckhannon Board and Care Home, Inc. v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court opinion in Riegel v. [read post]
20 Feb 2008, 8:38 am
The Supreme Court opinion in Riegel v. [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 8:27 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:54 am
In the case of Healthcare Retirement Corporation of America v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]
17 Mar 2025, 11:13 am
Strict Scrutiny of Obligation to Enforce Stated Policies The statute requires businesses to enforce their stated policies. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
Kudos for working on a nonpaying matter rather than just cranking out higher bills on paying work. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 8:41 am
A delay letter stating that payment of the provider's bill was being delayed "pending adjuster's review" and "investigation" does not serve to toll the 30-day pay or deny period of New York Insurance Law § 5106(a) and 11 NYCRR § 65-3.8. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:12 pm
Peck v. [read post]