Search for: "DOMINIC v. STATE"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,088
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Apr 2021, 9:03 pm
In that case, the ECJ was asked to consider the validity of the Standard Contractual Clauses Decision and the Privacy Shield—the two mechanisms under which the data of European citizens were being transferred to the United States under Part V of the GDPR. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:37 am
The Court accepted the appeals — under the general title, McConnell v. [read post]
9 May 2022, 11:30 am
By Michele Merritt As legal scholars have predicted since the current composition of the United States Supreme Court became apparent, abortion restrictions are increasing; if Roe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:16 am
In Kesner v. [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 2:25 pm
Maheera and Urantia Foundation v. [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 1:14 am
Lindon and others v. [read post]
14 Apr 2015, 2:16 am
The media landscape is being dominated by the pro-Conservative agenda, according to Roy Greenslade. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 12:09 pm
That goal ultimately came to have bipartisan support in the United States, largely as a result of Selikoff’s advocacy. [read post]
8 Jul 2023, 4:11 am
The state of freedom of expression online is substantially shaped by the moderation of content on dominant social media platforms. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 9:05 am
By coopting people and things that would disrupt their dominance. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 10:32 am
Hodges striking down state bans on same-sex marriage. [read post]
21 Mar 2010, 2:00 pm
We British, sadly, are conditioned from birth to be feudally hierarchical, to make subtle distinctions of class, intelligence, tribe etc etc etc… we have State School v Public School, Oxbridge v Red Brick…. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:58 pm
As a result, the plaintiffs did not state a viable tort claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:58 pm
As a result, the plaintiffs did not state a viable tort claim. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 12:58 pm
As a result, the plaintiffs did not state a viable tort claim. [read post]
18 Sep 2022, 4:19 am
United States v. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 3:54 am
In the courts: BN, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2367 (Admin) (16 September 2011): Sec of State irrational in ignoring fresh evidence in Malawi asylum claim. [read post]
7 Feb 2016, 1:32 pm
In People v. [read post]
21 Sep 2006, 2:03 pm
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 1:16 pm
Spotify AB v. [read post]
