Search for: "Does 1-10"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 41,643
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jan 2015, 10:36 am
Please join us for our complimentary webinar on January 27, 2015, at 1:00 p.m. e.s.t., where we will discuss them in greater detail. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 8:55 pm
Id. at *10 (internal citations omitted). [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 2:00 pm
For example, if someone has a B-1/B-2 visitor visa in their passport, and the consular officer determines that the person has immigrant intent (they plan to stay in the US and apply for a green card) during the person’s application for an H-1B visa, the consular officer may choose to cancel the B-1/B-2 visitor visa. *** Published 10/1918 by attorney Ari Sauer. [read post]
9 Feb 2021, 5:01 am
Does 1-254, as Identified in Exh. 2, decided Saturday by Judge Matthew F. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 2:37 am
The law does not just apply to sales over $2 million. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
Answer #1 No. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 8:11 am
Sentencing is scheduled for 4/4/14 at 10:00 a.m. in Syracuse, New York. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
Claim 1 under consideration does not add any further structural features which would make the device suitable for segregating liquids from gases only. [read post]
14 Aug 2018, 5:07 am
The features might be considered an idea because (1) it is so well known that its expression required no sufficient skill and labour (2) the idea has been expressed in such a trivial manner that it does not satisfy the test for originality, or (3) the expression of the idea does merit copyright protection, but the second song has not taken the skill and labour of the first. [read post]
18 Sep 2015, 6:00 am
Answer #1 No. [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:23 pm
What does all of this mean for you? [read post]
8 Mar 2020, 9:23 pm
What does all of this mean for you? [read post]
3 May 2008, 5:29 pm
This study does not distinguish between recidivism of the same crime -vs- recidivism of different crimes. [read post]
26 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm
However, the fact that the Board has come to a different conclusion from the department of first instance does not by itself mean that the latter committed a substantial procedural violation (see for example decisions T 87/88; T 538/89, T 182/92) but is rather a matter of judgment, which does not amount to a procedural violation (see for example decision T 182/92 [7] and Case Law of the Boards of Appeal of the EPO, 7th edition 2013, IV.E.8.3.5). [read post]
31 Jul 2015, 11:42 am
1. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:59 pm
Applications 6 and 8 insufficiently and incorrectly stated that (1) U.S. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 7:03 am
When does expression "go too far? [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 7:46 am
This holding is in direct conflict with Third and Ninth Circuit decisions holding that Item 303 does not create such an independent duty to disclose. [read post]
16 Sep 2015, 5:18 am
It does not describe the CCP's line in its entirety. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 10:00 pm
Cheese products being recalled by MDS Foods Inc. because of contamination found in products: Item# Brand Product Size Piece UPC Case UPC Date(s) 55209 Amish Classics Colby Deli (Mini) Horn 6 lb 8 28653 552093 00 8 28653 552093 Sell by: May 17, 2017 55241 Amish Classics Colby RW Fullmoon About 8 oz 8 28653… [read post]
