Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: A. C., A CHILD" Results 3021 - 3040 of 4,774
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 2:34 am by Russ Bensing
Redd, involving consecutive sentences for two counts of child endangering. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
See also my post, below.Re C (Contact) [2012] EWCA (14 November 2012)Care proceedings. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 12:34 am
Full story: The Telegraph.CASESRe C (Contact: Appeal) [2012] EWCA (14 November 2012)Local authority granted a s 34(4) order permitting a cessation of contact between the father and children. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 2:58 pm by Alvi
The term “related or subordinate” is defined in section 672(c) of the tax code. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 1:31 am by GuestPost
The ECtHR decision in D v Ireland is more interesting on this point. [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 3:50 am by Neil Ford
Maritime agency's Monaco trip funded by taxpayer - BBC - 15.11.12Officials of the Maritime and Coastguard Agency have been criticised for spending almost £20,000 sending four people to an annual boat show in Monaco during a period of cuts.London councils spend £23 million telling us about them - London Evening Standard - 14.11.12London councils spent more than £23 million on publicity last year. [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Section 384-c(3) specifically states that, "the sole purpose of notice under this section shall be to enable the person served pursuant to subdivision two to present evidence to the court relevant to the best interests of the child." [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 8:38 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Section 384-c(3) specifically states that, "the sole purpose of notice under this section shall be to enable the person served pursuant to subdivision two to present evidence to the court relevant to the best interests of the child. [read post]
7 Nov 2012, 4:40 pm by David Fraser
An interesting debate over lawful access is playing out in the pages of the Windsor Star. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 2:07 pm by Joseph Lamy
If the child, however, could have been delivered (by C-Section for instance) and then died from the injuries sustained in the automobile accident, then a cause of action for wrongful death could proceed. [read post]
1 Nov 2012, 5:54 am by Aaron Weems
  If both parents can claim the qualifying child under the four step test above, you must look at the tie-breaker rule of § 152(c)(4)(B) of the Code. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 3:39 pm
Respondent has moved to dismiss the petitions pursuant to Family Court Act § 1051 (c). [read post]