Search for: "Lee v. State "
Results 3021 - 3040
of 5,083
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 11:48 am
Florida Growhouse Conviction Overturned Florida Grow House Defense Attorney Lawyer just recieved a report from a colleague about a ruling in a federal growhouse case, United States V. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 7:00 am
Lee chose Virginia over the Union, and some prominent scholars—such as Edward Rubin and Malcolm Feeley—deny that modern Americans identify with their states at all. [read post]
18 Jun 2013, 12:00 pm
Not going out of state. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:18 am
Citing Walsh Bishop Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:43 am
Which is, of course, nonsense.When the Supreme Court decided Brown v. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
The Seventh Circuit is among the most willing of the circuits to shift fees, stating in Riviera Distributors, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
United States, 597 F. [read post]
3 Jun 2013, 4:37 am
The case is United States of America v. [read post]
31 May 2013, 7:50 am
At ACSblog, Brandon Garrett and Lee Kovarsky examine this week’s decisions in McQuiggin v. [read post]
29 May 2013, 9:01 pm
In Lee v. [read post]
24 May 2013, 10:34 am
This takes us back to a case in 2005, NCTA v. [read post]
23 May 2013, 10:06 am
Vincent Chiao -- Criminalization and Liberalism Michael Rich -- Flipping the Murder Switch: Limits on the Perfect Preventive State Youngjae Lee -- Moral Uncertainty and Reasonable Doubt Moderator/Discussant: Michael Cahill Criminal Justice 04: Substantive Crimes and Defenses Fri. [read post]
23 May 2013, 9:53 am
This position on injunctive relief being unavailable in light of a FRAND licensing commitment is consistent with Judge Posner's Apple v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 3:02 pm
Justice Melnick in C.K.B.M. v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 2:36 pm
United States, 11-10835, was put on hold to allow a Fourth Circuit case, Shrader v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
Unfortunately, the Dutch Supreme Court came to the opposite conclusion and held in Sara Lee v Integro (Case C02/227HR) that an essential element must be one which distinguished the invention from the prior art. [read post]
