Search for: "Matter of G. C. ," Results 3021 - 3040 of 4,013
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The United States of America and the Republic of Turkey, desiring to cooperate more effectively in the repression of crime by newly regulating extradition of offenders and by providing for mutual assistance in criminal matters, have decided to conclude a Treaty on Extradition and Mutual Assistance in Criminal Matters and, to that end, have appointed as their Plenipotentiaries: Ronald I. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The basis on which the status of opponent is obtained and enjoyed is thus a matter of procedural law (G 3/97 [2.1]). [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign… [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm by Ronaldo Lemos
c) The majority of Brazilian universities´ websites are only in Portuguese. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm by Ronaldo Lemos
c) The majority of Brazilian universities´ websites are only in Portuguese. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 7:53 am by Joel R. Brandes
Petitioner then commenced a proceeding seeking registration and enforcement of the Texas order ( Domestic Relations Law 77-d, 77-g). [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Articles 8 to 10 address matters related to the presentation and processing of extradition requests. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The patentee did not want to delete dependent claim 11 as granted because of the commercial interest in the subject-matter claimed therein.According to the principle of party disposition, it is the patentee’s sole right and responsibility to define the subject-matter of the patent in opposition proceedings. [read post]
11 Jun 2011, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
”In G 1/98 [3.10] the EBA states “[t]hat A 53(b) defines the borderline between patent protection and plant variety protection. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be an extraditable offense whether or not the laws in the two States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation, or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or foreign commerce, such matters… [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ground for opposition under A 100(c) therefore does not prejudice the maintenance of a European patent which includes such a feature. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Yes.The text of 35 USC 102:A person shall be entitled to a patent unless -(a) the invention was known or used by others in this country, or patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country, before the invention thereof by the applicant for patent, or(b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: (1) whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (2) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or… [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Additional flexibility is provided by Article 2(3), which provides that an offense shall be considered an extraditable offense: (1) whether or not the laws in the Contracting States place the offense within the same category of offenses or describe the offense by the same terminology; or (2) whether or not the offense is one for which United States federal law requires the showing of such matters as interstate transportation or use of the mails or of other facilities affecting interstate or… [read post]