Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 3021 - 3040 of 3,454
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2010, 5:54 am
Ultimately the Court of Appeals considered the matter in terms of a court's authority to overturn or modify an administrative disciplinary decision or a disciplinary penalty imposed on a worker [Kelly v Safir, 96 N.Y.2d 32].The Court of Appeals, ruled:1. [read post]
29 Jul 2020, 5:24 pm by Eugene Volokh
I couldn't find any Supreme Court case or appellate case dealing specifically with speech-restrictive pretrial release conditions, but U.S. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 5:12 am by Ray Mullman
" The plaintiffs say the New York Supreme Court agreed and dismissed the complaint. [read post]
2 Oct 2024, 11:25 am by fjhinojosa
Beermann, The Anti-Innovation Supreme Court: Major Questions, Delegation, Chevron, and More, 65 Wm. [read post]
23 Oct 2011, 9:06 am by Schachtman
Berger, “The Supreme Court’s Trilogy on the Admissibility of Expert Testimony,” RMSE 2d 9, 24 (2000). [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 8:41 am by Eugene Volokh
I couldn't find any Supreme Court case or appellate case dealing specifically with speech-restrictive pretrial release conditions, but U.S. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2007, 1:01 am
High Court The Associated Press In a 4-2 ruling, the Illinois Supreme Court on Wednesday ordered a lower court judge to stop asking for permission to reopen a failed lawsuit against Philip Morris over the company's light cigarettes, effectively putting an end to the high-profile litigation. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 7:27 pm by Schachtman
Bendectin litigation, including the Daubert case in Supreme Court and in the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
3 Mar 2023, 7:32 am by Eugene Volokh
The Supreme Court has now responded by setting forth a new legal framework in Bruen. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am by Public Employment Law Press
Civil Service Employees Ass'n, 8 N.Y.3d 513, “Once such an informed decision as to which positions are to be [abolished] is made, §80(1) obligates the employer to respect the seniority rights of its employees. [read post]