Search for: "STATE v. SAMPLE"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Feb 2012, 3:34 pm
Here's a sampling: Smith v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
The expression ‘P=.05’ means that there is one chance in twenty that a result showing increased risk was caused by a sampling error—i.e., that the randomly selected sample accidentally turned out to be so unrepresentative that it falsely indicates an elevated risk. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 5:54 am
bit.ly/zwruTK (Ron Friedmann) Cost of Converting (Electronically Stored Information) Jardin v. [read post]
28 Feb 2012, 9:48 am
The court ruled in 1993’s Herrera v. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:11 pm
In that case, Kleen Products LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 3:27 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 6:28 am
" Haskell v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
In Duran v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 9:52 am
”In State v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 8:03 am
The ruling in Nebaska v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
In the case of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 2:13 pm
In the case of State of Minnesota v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:39 am
Haskell v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 11:05 am
But, Colorado is probably a perfect state to use for a sample. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 10:20 am
Despite early reports, the parties in the case (Da Silva Moore v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:22 pm
Given the CCH v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:21 pm
All state laws vary. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 11:15 am
Salvio v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
In Kyllo v. [read post]
