Search for: "Scalia v. United States"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,639
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Feb 2018, 8:35 pm
It is also possible that the Trump administration (which is no fan of Obamacare) will choose not to defend the constitutionality of the mandate, in which case the court might appoint an independent lawyer to defend the statute (as it did in the 1982 Bob Jones case) or allow blue states to step in to defend (as lawyers hired by mostly Republican members Congress were allowed to step in to defend a provision of the Defense of Marriage Act, which the Obama administration refused to defend in… [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Here's Samuel Alito, that's Associate Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States, explaining the problem.The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a “defense expert” at the penalty phase of Buck’s capital trial. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 11:25 am
Here's Samuel Alito, that's Associate Justice Samuel Alito of the Supreme Court of the United States, explaining the problem.The petition in this case concerns bizarre and objectionable testimony given by a “defense expert” at the penalty phase of Buck’s capital trial. [read blog]
9 Nov 2020, 7:20 pm
United States). [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
In his concurrence to Webster v. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 11:40 am
” If a majority of the Justices choose to side with the State of California and open the floodgates to a new era of speech regulation, I very much looking forward to seeing how they reconcile that with their decision last term in the controversial case of United States v. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:30 pm
One example of such a case was United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
United States as an example of the potential balance between "textualist" judicial analyses and those that are more "structural and prudential. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 8:58 am
In United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 4:44 pm
At least that's better than the United States' brief in a related case. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 12:06 pm
United States, 293 F.2d 1013 (D.C. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 1:38 pm
That’s what “should” have happened in Bush v. [read post]
27 Dec 2017, 3:07 am
United States (1928) articulated a constitutional right to privacy. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:12 am
Further, the United States Supreme Court reminded us again in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
8 May 2014, 12:28 pm
Further, the United States Supreme Court reminded us again in CIGNA Corp. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2012, 7:59 pm
United States, 517 U.S. 748, 755 (1996). [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
As the Supreme Court stated in footnote 35 of Stone v. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 4:00 am
United States that challenges to impeachment are non-justiciable. [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 1:58 pm
The statute in which the disputed provision appears is titled “United States Policy with Respect to Jerusalem as the capital of Israel. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 4:45 am
Then what United States interest is there that should override that? [read post]
