Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 4,684
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2014, 4:00 am
The court noted that in Gomez v Stout, 13 NY3d 182, the Court of Appeals interpreted Civil Service Law §7 (2) to "require that the power to discipline be delegated, if necessary, with the governmental department's chain of command…. [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 10:08 am
Feb. 5, 2012), the court dismissed a comprehensive set of claims against generic makers of propoxyphene (the generic equivalent of Darvon), finding that all of the claims are either preempted under PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2018, 9:16 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2024, 10:30 pm
This guideline falls entirely flat à la hongrois; the now-purged editorial boards of Hungarian media providers are composed of decision-makers who voluntarily align with the government position. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 2:54 pm
You are not the law maker. [read post]
23 Nov 2021, 8:38 pm
This Tuesday, the Mannheim Regional Court gave short shrift to Deutsche Telekom v. [read post]
16 Sep 2019, 2:45 am
Both Conferences will be available for CLE credit in all states except for a few – but hours for each state vary; see this “List: CLE Credit By State. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 2:13 pm
In the decision, Kassman v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 9:23 am
Sadofski v. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 12:30 pm
In contrast to judges in other states, however, Delaware chancellors frequently have considerable prior corporate experience as practitioners. [read post]
24 Aug 2021, 2:32 pm
In UFCW v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 4:55 pm
By James KachmarIn Jarvis v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 8:06 am
Buck v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 7:50 am
Not with his bootlylicious bottom, but with his judgment in the case of Lancashire County Council v M & Ors [2016] EWFC 9 (04 February 2016), just published. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(Afro-IP) Spain Trade mark cancellation and damages: a matter of (bad) faith (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC (Pat): No ruling on hypothetical issue: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd (IPKat) EWHC (Pat): EP 258 valid in Netherlands but not UK: Novartis AG and Cibavision AG v Johnson & Johnson Medical Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: Trial judge says ‘Boileau’ to patent licence; appeal court agrees: Oxonica Energy Ltd v Neuftec… [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am
SAYS, United States v. [read post]
23 May 2024, 5:27 am
Adding to these challenges is the adoption by the Supreme Court of the “Major Questions Doctrine” in the 2022 case West Virginia v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 5:17 am
Don’t blame trial lawyers and create a false dichotomy of “business v. lawyers. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Eryurekler v Hackney LBC. [read post]
17 May 2010, 12:58 am
Eryurekler v Hackney LBC. [read post]
