Search for: "State v. Person"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 75,599
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Oct 2018, 4:26 pm
An interesting dissent from denial of review by Texas's high court for criminal cases.From today's opinion in Ogle v. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:39 am
Copyright © 2009 This feed is for personal, non-commercial use only. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 9:33 am
In November of 2009, the Washington State Supreme Court heard oral arguments regarding Tobin v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Sterchi v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Sterchi v. [read post]
20 Apr 2016, 9:34 am
Facts of the Case In the case of Sterchi v. [read post]
30 Nov 2023, 10:57 am
White v. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 6:12 am
What will happen, though, when a person falsely gives a local address? [read post]
22 May 2013, 12:24 pm
State v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 5:39 am
Fernandez v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
The Montana Supreme Court held that Montana has specific personal jurisdiction over Ford.Similarly, in Ford Motor Co. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
But one state judge held in September 2006 that it was unconstitutional, asserting in Graham v. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:38 am
However, the Florida Supreme Court in Dorsey v. [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 9:27 am
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit on Monday, July 26, 2010, in State of North Carolina v. [read post]
6 Jul 2016, 2:21 pm
The post Utah v. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 5:20 pm
Smith “did not hold that states must provide the same publicly funded benefits to all married persons,” regardless of whether their marriages are same-sex or opposite sex. [read post]
19 Sep 2017, 5:58 am
Groch v. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:05 pm
Tea Co. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 10:11 am
Arizona: The State of Arizona convicted Ramin Khorrami of serious crimes before an 8-member jury. [read post]
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am
The middle clause [2], by contrast—the “Officials Clause”—describes the precondition for someone being potentially subject to Section 3 in the first instance, namely, that the person has at some earlier point “taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the… [read post]
