Search for: "State v. Sessions" Results 3021 - 3040 of 6,576
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Feb 2017, 4:23 am by Edith Roberts
Sessions, in which the justices will decide whether a state-law conviction of “sexual abuse of a minor” constitutes an “aggravated felony” under federal immigration law that requires the removal of a lawful permanent resident. [read post]
25 Feb 2017, 7:00 am by Jordan Brunner
Robert Loeb and Emma Kohse examined the first invocation of the state secrets privilege by the DOJ in the Trump administration in Salim v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 3:16 pm by Edith Roberts
She noted that the “Notorious RBG” meme took hold following her 2013 dissent in Shelby County v. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 6:55 am by Kevin Johnson
Sessions, which stems from the government’s effort to remove a lawful permanent resident for a “sex crime. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 8:58 am by Steve Lubet
”  Simply stated, a judge or justice cannot be disqualified on the basis of a spouse’s general political activity. [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 6:21 am
The case is Tartan Army Ltd v Sett GmbH and Others [2017] CSOH 22. [read post]
15 Feb 2017, 2:53 am
Despite a few notable exceptions, this field of inquiry was still in an embryonic state in the late 1980s. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 4:24 pm by INFORRM
Relatedly, in South Africa and Tanzania, there have been occasions where live broadcasts of parliament sessions have been interfered with. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:45 am by Edith Roberts
Abassi, a suit against former high-ranking federal officials stemming from detentions of Middle Eastern men in the wake of the September 11 attacks, and Sessions v. [read post]
13 Feb 2017, 7:04 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
For example, it has been held that late attendance for a school “session” may count as non-attendance (Hinchley v Rankin [1961] 1 WLR 421) and that the fact that a child had run away from home to live with her boyfriend, without informing her mother where she was, did not provide the mother with a defence (Bath and North East Somerset DC v Warman [1999] ELR 81). [read post]