Search for: "Superior Court of California"
Results 3021 - 3040
of 10,168
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
California Court Tentatively Dismisses Monstano’s Lawsuit Against OEHHA to Block Addition of Glyphos
1 Feb 2017, 1:11 pm
., Case No. 16 CE CG 00183, by the Superior Court of California, County of Fresno, granted the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s (OEHHA or Defendant) motion for judgment on the pleadings as to Monsanto Company’s (Monsanto) petition and complaint, and sustained the demurrers to Monsanto’s petition and complaint (Sierra Club) and California Citrus’ complaint in intervention, for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1972) 22 CA3d 812, 821. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 10:00 am
Superior Court (1972) 22 CA3d 812, 821. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 8:38 am
Wikipedia notes an additional IP issue:On November 1, 2016, My Pillow agreed to pay $1 million ($995,000 in civil penalties and $100,000 California charities benefiting the homeless and victims of domestic violence) to settle a false advertising lawsuit brought in Alameda County Superior Court by Alameda County and eight other California counties. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 7:11 am
The post Bankruptcy Alphabet: Q is for Questions appeared first on Northern California Bankruptcy Lawyer. [read post]
28 Jan 2017, 6:24 am
The California State Bar Court approved a two-year suspension and probation by agreement of an attorney who had altered an expert report used in a criminal trial to make it appear more current and sound more favorable to the client.... [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, 16-466, involving the showing necessary to establish specific jurisdiction. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
27 Jan 2017, 9:11 am
Court of Appeals for the D.C. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 1:35 pm
And there's not only something to that position, but, in this case, the California Supreme Court granted Hudson's petition for review and sent the case back to the Court of Appeal for an examination of this claims. [read post]
26 Jan 2017, 8:59 am
Enlarge An iPhone ad featuring the Jamie xx song "I Know There's Gonna Be (Good Times)" is the subject of a lawsuit filed Tuesday in California Superior Court. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 1:27 pm
Throughout Jim’s legal career, he has tried and won cases at the Superior, Appellate and Supreme Court levels in California. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
Instead, it demands that a Los Angeles Superior Court judge block Apple from selling iPhones in the Golden State until the devices are updated to include Apple's patented technology to lock drivers out of their phones while driving. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 11:13 am
Instead, it demands that a Los Angeles Superior Court judge block Apple from selling iPhones in the Golden State until the devices are updated to include Apple's patented technology to lock drivers out of their phones while driving. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
A Texas couple recently sued Apple, Inc. in Santa Clara Superior Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 12:52 pm
A Texas couple recently sued Apple, Inc. in Santa Clara Superior Court. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 7:59 am
”Trade libel under California law: This requires that the defendant made a false statement of fact, the statement was made with actual malice, and the false statement diverted business away from the plaintiff or [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 3:00 am
The plaintiff, purchaser of Chobani yogurt for personal consumption, brought a putative class action in California Superior Court on behalf of a class of all California retail purchasers of the Chobani Products alleging violation of California’s Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), False Advertising Law, Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”), and negligent misrepresentation. [read post]
22 Jan 2017, 7:47 pm
The complaint, filed with the Los Angeles Superior Court on Tuesday, asserts that Apple’s willful decision not to implement a lock-out mechanism on iPhones, chiefly to prevent texting and driving, constitutes “unfair business acts and practices” under California’s Unfair Competition Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2017, 7:00 am
The decision of a hearing officer will constitute the City’s final position, which can then only be reviewed by a petition for writ of mandate to the Superior Court. [read post]
