Search for: "United States v. Circuit Judges" Results 3021 - 3040 of 16,264
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jun 2009, 1:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2019, 10:03 pm by Joel R. Brandes
Flández-Marcel, 2019 WL 6836785 (First Circuit, 2019) the district court denied Alejandro Díaz-Alarcón petition for return of his daughter from the United States to Chile. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 1:32 pm
  Here is the starting paragraph:This appeal concerns the bounds of "reasonableness" after United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 4:08 am by Florian Mueller
The top U.S. court's decision follows (literally and figuratively) the position taken by the Solicitor General of the United States, which was not a given but isn't much of a surprise either.While I still believe the three Federal Circuit panel judges who threw out the $119 million decision got it right, the Supreme Court can only hear a limited number of cases per year. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 12:40 pm
The fact that you get thrown out of the United States forever because the USPS messed up is, well, tough.But Judge Kleinfeld's dissent is a perfect example of a different type of reasoning; in a way, a different type of judging. [read post]
13 May 2021, 12:23 pm
He objectively and officially manifested his intent to reside permanently in the United States by filing an adjustment of status application before he turned eighteen. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 3:01 pm by Orin Kerr
Lemus, linked to by Eugene below, Judge Kozinski writes: Government encroachment into the home, which I lamented three years ago in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2007, 9:45 am
A three-judge panel of the court, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, said taxing awards for nonphysical compensatory damages did not violate the Constitution. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 11:20 am by Orin Kerr
Over at Lawfare, I have a long post criticizing the reasoning of the Ninth Circuit’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 1:45 pm
Professor Aviam Soifer argued against the narrowing of the 1866 Civil Rights Act urged by judges including Judge Bybee of the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
19 Dec 2007, 11:18 am
The Court also approved the admission of a substantial amount of other-bad-acts evidence to prove intent, thereby reaffirming the broad reach of Rule 404(b) in fraud cases.The case, United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:04 pm by Bridget Crawford
  We can expect action in both the Second Circuit (this case) and the First Circuit (in Gill v. [read post]