Search for: "United States v. Michigan" Results 3021 - 3040 of 3,728
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Apr 2010, 4:58 am by Susan Brenner
District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan recently addressed this issue in U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 6:35 am by Jay Willis
  At The New York Times, Adam Liptak reports that the grant – which came less than a week after the Court’s decision in another free-speech case, United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 pm by Gideon
LaFave, Search and Seizure [3d Ed. 1996] § 3.5 [b], p. 259 n.46.); State v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am by James Bickford
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 7:05 am by Lyle Denniston
  (The old cases were Original 1, 2 and 3, Wisconsin-Michigan-New York, et al., v. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 10:36 am by WIMS
(Copar), proceeding under the Administrative Procedure Act, (APA), appeals the district court's denial of its petition for review concerning the Notice of Noncompliance that the United States Forest Service (FS) issued to Copar concerning its pumice mining activities. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 7:39 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
The general rule is what makes the Sticklen case at Michigan State so remarkable.As to tebartlett, there are at least two interesting aspects to the Poshard matter. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am by Tom Goldstein
  His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 7:38 am
The United States Supreme Court is silent on this issue. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 2:19 pm by Jim Harper
Stevens wrote in his dissent that “This case is about power — the power of the Congress of the United States to create a private federal cause of action against a State, or its Governor, for the violation of a federal right. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:22 am by Jason Byrne
  In this case, the Court of Appeals considered the application of the recent United States Supreme Court opinion in Arizona v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:19 pm by WIMS
      On August 22, 2008, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania entered judgment against Carpenter, finding it liable for 80% of the costs paid by the plaintiffs as of December 31, 2007, plus prejudgment interest. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:16 pm by WIMS
At issue is whether the STB and the second respondent, the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS), complied with their obligations under § 7 of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) to ensure that the proposed rail was "not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered species" before approving the exemption. 16 U.S.C. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 9:30 am by Greg Guedel
This view is supported by a 2009 empirical study done by Matthew Fletcher of Michigan State University College of Law: "Factbound and Splitless: Certiorari and Indian Law. [read post]