Search for: "BOX v. STATE" Results 3041 - 3060 of 5,284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2019, 4:56 am by Vishnu Kannan
District Court for the Northern District of California decision to issue a preliminary injunction in East Bay Sanctuary et al. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
If you have been following the saga of the Samsung v Apple patent litigation in England and Wales, which has been stayed so that Samsung can apply to the European Patent Office to have its patents amended (see earlier Katpost here), there's a small but significant sequel, noted on PatLit here. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 12:38 pm
  Whether the laboratory use is protected by the six year statute of limitations is dependent on whether a valid building permit was issued (and can be found) that stated that a portion of the building would be used for a laboratory. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:50 am by Kenneth Vercammen Esq. Edison
Medical expenses can be deducted in the inheritance tax.Under United States Supreme Court Case, Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc., v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:11 am by Randy Barnett
(Randy Barnett) In an earlier post, Orin compares the current challenges to the constitutionality of the individual insurance mandate to debates on this blog over the case of McDonald v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 5:55 am by Andrew Appel
  That is, you can trust the crypto, or you can trust the chain of custody of paper ballot boxes, or both. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 8:18 am by Lydia Estep
Civil Rights and Sexual Orientation On June 15, 2020, the Supreme Court decided Bostock v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 11:20 am
Sanctions ordered after lawsuit filed pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law ruled frivolousMatter of Fenstermaker v Edgemont Union Free School Dist., 2006 NY Slip Op 52652(U), Decided on September 26, 2006, Supreme Court, Westchester County, Loehr, J. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
The test was devised by Justice Stewart in United States v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 2:11 pm
 The granting of declaratory relief is pragmatic and discretionary and can assist in achieving justice between the parties (see Messier-Doughty v Sabena [2001] 1 All ER 275 and Financial Services Authority v Rourke [2002] CP Rep 14; see also Nokia Corp v Interdigital [2006] EWCH Civ 1618; [2007] FSR 23). [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:30 pm by David Russcol
The second change, in 2014, came in the Supreme Judicial Court’s decision in Commonwealth v. [read post]