Search for: "Crawford " Results 3041 - 3060 of 6,160
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2011, 6:04 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Schultze, Center for Information and Technology Policy (CITP), Princeton, proposer Susan Crawford, Cardozo Neil Fried, House Commerce Committee (invited) [4] Safe Harbors for Trademark Fair Use William McGeveran, Minnesota, proposer Felix Wu, Cardozo Christal Sheppard, House Judiciary Committee David H. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 9:43 am by Aaron
Courtesy of Law Offices of Dena Alo-Colbeck “Writing and Research for Washington Attorneys” Washington State Law Washington State Supreme Court: State v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Richard D. Friedman
This procedure is far better for truth determination than is cross-examination in open court of a very young child, and offers the accused a better opportunity to explore weaknesses in the child's account.Defense counsel might consider making an argument along these lines as an alternative to an objection to a child's statements based on the Confrontation Clause; I think courts will find the relief called for by this argument much more appealing than a holing that the child must be subject… [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Bryant on the scope of Crawford v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 3:41 am by Mirriam Seddiq
  Speaking of dead and communication.In a decision that basically all but over-ruled their decision in Crawford v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 4:15 am by Lisa McElroy
  In a landmark 2004 case called Crawford v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:01 pm by emagraken
Justice Crawford granted the motion and reduced the damages by approximately $200,000. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:21 am by Stephen Gillers
The Court has long been at sea on the meaning of the clause and Crawford and later Davis v. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 9:11 am by Christa Culver
PennsylvaniaDocket: 09-1396Issue(s): Whether a child's statements in an interview with a child protection agency worker investigating suspicions of past abuse are “testimonial” evidence subject to the demands of the Confrontation Clause under Crawford v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 2:26 pm by Matt Brown
Instead, I’d rather think back to Crawford v. [read post]