Search for: "Degree v. United States" Results 3041 - 3060 of 6,520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jun 2012, 11:23 am by Rekha Arulanantham
Doe, which guarantees a basic K-12 education to all children residing in the United States, regardless of their immigration status. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
" Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
12 May 2012, 5:15 am by NL
" Following D v United Kingdom (1997) 24 EHRR (and BB v France (see N v UK at D68), the case was exceptional because Mr De A was at the end of his life. [read post]
27 Mar 2012, 1:32 pm by Rachel Price
United States http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf (23 January 2012) This judgment has been hailed by commentators as one of the most significant Fourth Amendment decisions of the decade. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 6:50 am
A “canine unit entered the house and [Moreno] came out . . . and was arrested. [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 1:28 am by Florian Mueller
I would be shocked if the highest echelons of the federal judiciary of the United States couldn't make it work in principle. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am by Bexis
  Answer:  Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:02 am
United States, holding that the government had failed to establish the existence of a tax deficiency. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:45 am by CJLF Staff
"   CJLF has also filed an amicus curiae brief in United States v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
We therefore reverse the grant of summaryjudgment for Sunovion.Of public useAn applicant may not receive a patent for an inventionthat was “in public use . . . in this country, more thanone year prior to the date of the application for patent inthe United States. [read post]