Search for: "Does, 1-25"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 18,561
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
CAISO recommends, but does not mandate, clear and transparent Requests For Information processes leading up to the LSE allocation process. [read post]
4 May 2011, 4:32 pm
In outline form, they are (see the relevant CFR for more detail at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-04-25/html/2011-9805.htm): 1) Proposed Changes to Both Ex Parte and Inter Partes Reexaminations: A. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:25 am
The new DWI does not apply to “Personal Mobility Devices” (PMD’s”), also known as Segways, but does appear to cover battery operated wheelchairs! [read post]
26 Nov 2018, 2:09 am
Miquel MontañáIn its judgment of 25 July 2018 (Case C-121/17 Teva v. [read post]
4 May 2011, 8:05 pm
In outline form, they are (see the relevant CFR for more detail at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-04-25/html/2011-9805.htm): 1) Proposed Changes to Both Ex Parte and Inter Partes Reexaminations: A. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 11:19 am
§ 101.0215(a)(1), (25), (31). [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 8:09 pm
However, this does not change the exercise of statutory interpretation to be undertaken by the Court (Lavigne at para 25). [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm
If an ALJ does not gra [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
The deadline for providing feedback is before May 25, 2016. [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 1:00 pm
He does not wish to detract in any way from this desire. [read post]
29 Mar 2024, 5:21 am
The approval of a clinical trial does therefore not, by way of a heuristic, imply an expected positive outcome of the treatment. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 8:16 am
Cir. 2016) (remanding forfailure to articulate a motivation to combine).To be clear, the Board’s error here does not stem fromits disregard for the teachings of any particular reference.As Tire Hanger correctly observes, the law does notrequire that the Board address every conceivable combinationof prior art discussed throughout an IPR proceeding,no matter how duplicative the other references are.Appellee’s Br. 29–30. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Not in 1 in 20. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 6:00 am
Our next “Immigration Q & A Forum” is scheduled for Friday, April 25, 2014! [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 9:21 pm
American Inst. of Physics, at *25.ii. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:03 am
This does not seem to give much time to consider such far-reaching proposals. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 6:53 pm
Wi LAN Inc., 25 F.4th 960, 967 (Fed. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 3:41 pm
Campbell On September 25, 2018, the U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2014, 9:00 am
§ 1 et seq. [read post]
31 Jul 2013, 7:21 pm
“Well, how does a reversal impact me? [read post]
