Search for: "Does 1-37" Results 3041 - 3060 of 5,286
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
  The only changes from the version published in the subcommittee’s agenda book were:  (1) a new sentence in Note for Rule 26(b)(1) encouraging computer search technology (that is to say, predictive coding), and (2) modifying the Note for Rule 37(e) concerning the role of prejudice in subsection (e)(2). [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 12:23 pm by emagraken
Norlander, 2012 BCSC 719 (Master)… [34]         Read together, the above authorities stand for these propositions: 1. [read post]
29 May 2014, 8:09 am by Jason Rantanen
These regulations permit the PTAB to “authorize [inter partes] review to proceed on all or some of the challenged claims” 37 C.F.R. [read post]
29 May 2014, 4:05 am by K.O. Herston
For example, reasonable efforts are not required if the trial court determines that certain statutorily defined “aggravated circumstances” exist per Tennessee Code Annotated § 37-1-166(g)(4)(A). [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:14 am by Lucy Reed
Secondly, the penal notice does not comply with FPR 37 as recently amended because it is not on the front of the order. [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:14 am by Lucy Reed
Secondly, the penal notice does not comply with FPR 37 as recently amended because it is not on the front of the order. [read post]
25 May 2014, 1:39 am by J
Affected landlords A landlord must not authorise a disqualified adult (not child – s.22(1), s.37(1) – so can I grant to a child to get around this issue? [read post]
22 May 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Their position requires that they be “held to higher standards of integrity and ethical conduct than attorneys or other persons not invested With the public trust”.[89] To ensure that the public does not lose confidence in the judicial system, a delicate balance is required to maintain a degree of judicial insulation from society so that judges remain impartial arbitrators While at the same time allowing them to be active members of the community. [read post]
16 May 2014, 2:41 pm by Cicely Wilson
The Supreme Judicial Court affirmed, holding that the recitation of the pledge, which no student is required to recite, does not violate the Constitution or the statute.Read More: Massachusetts High Court Says Pledge Does Not Violate Equal ProtectionInterested in reading more summaries? [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
 To resolve these questions, the IRS announced today (May 15, 2014) released an advance copy of Notice 2014-37, which is scheduled for official publication in Internal Revenue Bulletin 2014-23 on June 2, 2014. [read post]
15 May 2014, 6:11 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
.): 25 Greenwoods Motion for Summary J + Tribal Appellate Court Decision 27 State Farm Motion for Summary J 27-1 Tribal Court Complaint 27-3 State Farm Tribal Court Motion to Dismiss 37 Greenwood Response 38 State Farm Response 39 State Farm Reply 42 MJ Order An excerpt: In summary, the court concludes that the tribal court does have jurisdiction over the Greenwoods’ claims against State Farm. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:20 am by Terry Hart
Here, Oracle was claiming copyright protection to both: “(1) literal elements of its API packages—the 7,000 lines of declaring source code; and (2) non-literal elements—the structure, sequence, and organization of each of the 37 Java API packages. [read post]
10 May 2014, 6:51 am
In more general terms, does this decision imply a re-thinking of both earlier case law on computer programs and the idea/expression dichotomy, starting with the seminal decision in Baker v Selden? [read post]
10 May 2014, 3:47 am by Ben
District Judge William Alsup ruled that the Java APIs replicated by Google were not subject to copyright protection and were free for Google to use although the Judge said "This order does not hold that Java API packages are free for all to use without license" adding "It does not hold that the structure, sequence, and organization of all computer programs may be stolen. [read post]