Search for: "Harris v. Does"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,599
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2010, 9:49 am
What does the standard mean? [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:36 am
For additional background, see Jones v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 7:16 am
Harris Associates [Cornell LII backgrounder; JURIST report] that a shareholder does not have to show that a fund's investment adviser misled the fund's directors in order to have a cognizable claim of an excessive fee under § 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940 [ [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 11:07 am
MCDANIELFirst Court of Appeals tried to outsupreme the Supremes on behalf of med-mal defendants: SoL does not bar med-mal suit over surgical sponge left in body and undiscovered for more than 2 years after all -- but only for so many years (see below):Walters v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 8:43 pm
But on first read, this statement does not do that at all. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:07 am
Kaye also examines legal milestones, such as People v. [read post]
19 Mar 2010, 12:58 pm
However, the court’s decision in Dickerson v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 11:42 am
The appeal in Harris v. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 4:23 am
Calvao v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:47 am
” See Matter of Committee on Professional Standards v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:43 pm
The article does not bother to even mention it. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 12:09 pm
NEA v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 11:04 am
Greenhouse frames her argument as a contrast between two briefs–one by Sandra Cano (the former “Mary Doe” of Doe v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 10:14 am
Powell and Harry Blackmun (Nixon), David H. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 6:05 am
The case, Margot Bergensen v. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Dawn Harris-Young, EPA, March 8, 2010 Norfolk Southern Railway Company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged violations of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and hazardous materials laws for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, S.C., the Justice Department and U.S. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 4:50 pm
Background In Pham v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 6:02 am
Harris v. [read post]
9 Mar 2010, 12:22 pm
Beginning in 1989, the store #393 premises were operated as a grocery store - at that point, under the Harris-Teeter brand. [read post]
