Search for: "In Re: Mark M." Results 3041 - 3060 of 7,664
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2011, 7:30 am by J. Alex Halderman
The client secretly marks the connection as a Telex request by inserting a cryptographic tag into the headers. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 1:30 pm
I certainly won't mark down for it if you've done the rest of your work, and it may well add something to the answer. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 2:50 am by SHG
  Nonetheless, I'm giving it another try. [read post]
2 May 2024, 11:07 am by Overhauser Law Offices, LLC
Trademark Office issued the following  258 trademark registrations to persons and businesses in Indiana in April 2024 based on applications filed by Indiana trademark attorneys: Registration Number                              Wordmark 7361261 BCU MORTGAGE SERVICES M POWERING BANKS AND CREDIT UNIONS 7361262 BCU MORTGAGE SERVICES 7360700 OPENINSIGHTS 7370103 INDIANAMAP 7362517 AMPLIFY 7357362 POWERCARE 7363555… [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 6:53 pm by HumaRashid
These silk flats with little embellishments have been marked down from $118, and are just lovely! [read post]
15 May 2010, 8:33 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
"I'm always afraid the audience will get bored. [read post]
30 Oct 2010, 6:16 am by Michael Fitzgibbon
 It's unquestionably been one of the best experiences and I'm having fun. [read post]
26 Aug 2008, 9:39 am
And, of course, just a few more steps down that slope takes us to the urban legend of schools that call grads to find out if they're working, only to mark them as "employed" if they fail to return three calls in a row.We scream bloody murder when companies fake their numbers to meet analysts' expectations, because the fake numbers give the market bad information for investors. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:33 am
It suggests there's not so much we can learn from the past and that, by implication, we're flying relatively blind. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 1:44 pm by Mark Walsh
(I’m generally using “Brunetti’s mark” as my polite substitute.) [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
(ISinIP) CAFC grants en banc request to challenge written description requirement: Ariad v Lilly (Patently-O) (Filewrapper) (Washington State Patent Law Blog) (Patent Docs) (Holman's Biotech IP Blog) Supreme Court asked to yank obviousness from the purview of juries: Medela AG v Kinetic Concepts, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) All you need to know about Bilski in a 30 min podcast - debate between Prof M Risch and Prof J Sarnoff (IP Think Tank) (Patent Baristas)… [read post]