Search for: "In Re Brand" Results 3041 - 3060 of 14,121
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Your gas water heater probably stopped working, and now you’re thinking about how much it might cost to replace it on short notice. [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 10:02 am by Steve Baird®
  We’re thankful to be back here, to resume the legal and marketing team dance. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 3:13 am by John L. Welch
In re Jonathan Drew, Inc. dba Drew Estate, Serial No. 78979742 (December 31, 2009) [not precedential].The Board began by finding that the genus of goods is "cigars" and it ruled that the relevant public includes not only cigar "aficianodos" but also "ordinary members of the general public. [read post]
12 May 2012, 11:28 am by Kevin O'Keefe
We’re staying at the Davenport Hotel and Towers. [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:34 pm by Molly DiBianca
  If you’re not familiar with the endorsement guides, you can get up to speed by reading this post, Another Reason Employers Need a Social-Media Policy: New FTC Regulations. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 11:46 am by Will
We’re all curious to see what the Supreme Court does with the generic prescription drug manufacturers’ preemption defense in Actavis Elizabeth, LLC v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 3:00 am
Branding - I use Twitter to brand and market myself to my followers. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:24 am
Just look at the blockbuster Broadway hits of the last few decades: Wicked, an adaption of Gregory Maguire’s novel, a re-telling of L. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 5:30 am by Woodrow Pollack
 See In re DaimlerChrysler AG, Serial No. 74/734,869 (TTAB July 26, 001) ("The so-called ‘Teflon survey’ is widely accepted in determining whether a term is generic. [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
 It will be followed by another offering a thought or two on how brands, from lifestyle dictators, may be en route to exile from consumer life, ‘cleansed’ and re-defined by a new regulatory paternalism. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 3:14 am
In re Striker Brands LLC, Serial No. 87552915 (August 23, 2019) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Peter W. [read post]
26 Feb 2017, 3:31 am
 This was a trade mark/passing off case relating to UK and EU registered marks ‘Tartan Army’ decided by the Court of Session in Edinburgh.Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding"Neil reviews John Murphy’s book Brandfather: The Man Who Invented Branding.In his book Murphy describes his career from a job in corporate planning to the creation of a brand naming, such as PROZAC and ZENECA, and trademark prosecution company… [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 10:00 pm
In re Pennington Seed, Inc., 466 F.3d 1053, 1057, 80 USPQ2d 1758, 1761 (Fed. [read post]
2 May 2023, 8:06 am
In re 1729 Investments LLC, Serial No. 90694523 (April 24, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Cheryl S. [read post]
3 Mar 2014, 2:51 am
Trademarks are meant to be vehicles for reducing consumer confusion, not rewards for brand-building. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:50 am
In re Cyber Group Studios, Serial No. 79303731 (December 12, 2023) [not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Cheryl S. [read post]