Search for: "REED v. REED"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,268
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jan 2023, 3:22 am
Singapore Court of Appeal clarifies right to private action under the Singapore PDPA In a related development, in September 2022, the Court of Appeal in Singapore handed down a significant decision in Reed, Michael v Bellingham, Alex (Attorney-General, intervener) [2022] SGCA 60, clarifying that emotional distress can constitute “loss or damage” required to found a statutory right to private action under the Singapore PDPA. [read post]
27 Oct 2006, 10:37 pm
If so, the treaty power can't justify abrogating the copyright clause any more than it could justify abrogating Sixth Amendment rights, as in Reed v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 12:12 pm
USA, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 6:25 am
Mesa v. [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 4:12 pm
Devgan v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 8:00 am
Reed v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 7:05 am
Yesterday, federal District Judge Reed O'Connor issued a decision in Braidwood Management, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
Reason was that the answer by the European Court of Justice (Arsenal Football Club plc vs Matthew Reed) on whether non-origin-related use could constitute trademark infringement, was considered uncertain and controversial by UK professors Lionel Bently and Brad Sherman. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:34 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 US v. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 12:40 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, takes a look at what he regards as a likely SEC investigation and the questions that the SEC likely will be asking. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Last Week in the Courts On 4 to 7 February 2020 Warby J heard the trial in the case of Sube v News Group Newspapers. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 6:00 am
Bissett of Hughes Hubbard & Reed argued for Pioneer. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 10:03 am
A case that has not just clarified, but in effect re-written, the rules on a fundamental principle of contractual law is the seminal case of Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi and ParkingEye Limited v Beavis [2015] UKSC 67 (Case Comment here). [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 1:00 pm
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
10 Nov 2015, 12:00 pm
If you ever have to brief the Wyeth v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 1:16 pm
That is precisely what happened in Fields v. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 12:00 am
We have some important news to share from the Digital Media Law Project. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 11:01 am
Rather, Shuker v. [read post]
30 Jan 2018, 1:42 pm
., v. [read post]
