Search for: "State v. Bias" Results 3041 - 3060 of 5,335
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Apr 2014, 4:01 am by Steven Gursten
Fischer - will choose to make decisions based upon political bias instead of respect for precedent. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 6:17 am by Joy Waltemath
The employee filed the instant action against her employer in August 2013, alleging disability bias and reprisal. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 9:28 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case of SmithKline Beecham Corp. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 4:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The contours of that right are not clear, but they do not protect a former Assistant District Attorney in Brooklyn who lost his job after the DA learned that his father was running for office against a State Senator who was being prosecuted by his office.The case is Sharpe v. [read post]
14 Apr 2014, 12:01 pm
In examining bias, the Court will look to a state actor that “occupies two practically and seriously inconsistent positions” where one is subject to bias, particularly financial bias, and the other is regulatory. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 2:20 pm by John Elwood
  As you will recall from the eighteen times we’ve drummed it into your head, Hurles asks whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 8:42 am
The appeal argued that a state anti-bias law, when applied broadly, would “require individuals who create expression for a living -- like marketers, advertisers, publicists and website designers -- to speak in conflict with their consciences. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:51 am by Lyle Denniston
Hurles, testing the power of a federal court in a habeas case to find fault with a state court’s failure to hold an evidentiary hearing on an issue of judicial bias. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm by John Elwood
  Unless the question presented has spontaneously mutated during the small eternity the case has been pending, Hurles still involves whether it is per se unreasonable for a state not to provide an evidentiary hearing on a judicial-bias claim. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 7:11 am by Joy Waltemath
Denying JCI’s motion for summary judgment on the disability discrimination claims under the ADA and state law, the court first addressed whether a three-part test from Frengler v GM, a 2012 unpublished Sixth Circuit case, or a five-part test under Whitfield v Tennessee, a 2011 published decision, applied for purposes of a prima facie case. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 5:30 am by Renee Kolar
[v]  Second, other commentators reveal there is no support at all in the legislative history of the FAA for the idea that the Act was intended to prohibit state laws that preserve the right of claimants to arbitrate collectively. [read post]