Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B."
Results 3041 - 3060
of 15,324
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am
Mississippi originally adopted the existing Indian family doctrine in Matter of B.B.[25], but the case’s jurisdiction was postponed by Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 3:00 am
Fannin v UMTH_Land Dev. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:42 pm
Pending consideration of the appeal on file herein, enforcement of the superior court’s Peremptory Writ of Mandate, in Association of Irritated Residents et al. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 5:03 pm
A writes to B about his neighbor C: “He moved in six months ago. [read post]
2 Aug 2006, 8:22 am
According to MCR 2.612(C)(1), on motion and on just terms, the court may relieve a party or the legal representative of a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding on the following grounds:(f) Any other reason justifying relief from the operation of the judgment.(2) The motion must be made within a reasonable time, and, for the grounds stated in subrules (C)(1)(a), (b), and (c), within one year after the judgment, order, or proceeding was entered… [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 4:10 am
Section 2(b) prohibits registration of any mark that “consists of or comprises the ... insignia of ... any State or municipality .... [read post]
3 Jan 2018, 6:45 am
§ 2253(c)(2); and whether Richardson v. [read post]
8 Jul 2021, 7:11 pm
N.J.S.A. 26:2H-154(c).In 2002, prior to enactment of the Dementia Care Home Act, the Legislature recognized the existence of "assisted living residence[s]," defining them as facilities that "provide apartment-style housing and congregate dining. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 7:37 am
A building or any part of a building that is in danger of falling down or caving in is not considered to be in a state of collapse;c. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 7:05 am
The State appeals pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(B).State v. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:37 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:29 am
Marshall's amended complaint, in their motion for summary judgment prior to the first appeal in this case, and later in their post-verdict motion for judgment as a matter of law under Rule 50(b)(1)(C), the officers apparently did not raise qualified immunity in their pre-verdict Rule 50(a) motion, which is a prerequisite to a post-verdict motion under Rule 50(b). [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 5:53 am
In UMG v. [read post]
22 Jun 2023, 10:24 pm
S. 162 (2011); United States v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 5:06 am
” They instead chose to follow the European Court’s 2003 Murphy v. [read post]
9 Sep 2015, 11:53 am
Here are the materials in United States v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 6:57 pm
(“As is true of practiceunder Rule 12(b)(6), it is well-settled that it is within thedistrict court’s discretion whether to accept extra-pleadingmatter on a motion for judgment on the pleadings and treatit as one for summary judgment or to reject it and maintainthe character of the motion as one under Rule 12(c). [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 7:24 am
The West Virginia Supreme Court's opinion in Ryan v. [read post]
24 Feb 2010, 7:58 am
v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:32 am
Pensionsversicherungsanstalt v Brey (Case C-140/12) [2014] 1 WLR 1080 might seem to help Mr S rather more, however, there were subsequent decisions in Dano and another v Jobcenter Leipzig (Case C-333/13) [2015] 1 WLR 2519 and Alimanovic (Case C-67/14) EU:C:2015:597. [read post]
