Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 3041 - 3060 of 15,324
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Aug 2020, 1:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
An affidavit of the kind at issue here is not exempt from public disclosure under state, federal, or the common law, and does not otherwise fall within any of the exceptions set forth in Sup.R. 44(C)(2)(b), (d)-(h). [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 8:51 am by Christopher G. Hill
  After a thorough review of Virginia law, the Court agreed with White Oak and stated: [c]ourts applying Virginia law must consider the actual damages contemplated at the time of contract when determining the reasonableness of a liquidated damages provision. [read post]
30 Aug 2020, 7:21 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
If so, (2)are there any considerations which ought to negative or limit (a) the scope of the duty and (b) the class of persons to whom it is owed or (c) the damages to which a breach of it may give rise? [read post]
28 Aug 2020, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
So, I start to put all of this together: (1) being on the right side of history; (b) a rising tide against racism and brutality; and (c) a shocking, irrefutable video of racism and brutality. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
The court disagreed, stating that Vavilov has not changed the law with respect to the meaning of patent unreasonableness under s. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Here, Sawinski’s first lawsuit against CARB was dismissed “with prejudice” for lack of subject-matter-jurisdiction based on sovereign immunity (12(b)(1)) and also for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted (12(b)(6)). [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 6:41 am by Eric Goldman
Craigslist qualified for the Section 230(c)(1) immunity for the plaintiff’s state law claims: Websites are ICSs The plaintiff alleged that Craigslist “advertised” the victim. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:08 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” As we noted previously, the wording of the LLC Law differs markedly from Delaware’s LLC Act and that of many other states, which explicitly permit oral operating agreements. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 12:30 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
It’s not surprising that “coach” would have a lot of non-brand use b/c it’s an English word. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 1:20 pm by David Urban
  As Courts have phrased it, the balancing is “whether the [state]’s legitimate administrative interests outweigh the employee’s First Amendment rights. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 5:00 am by Christopher Tyner
The trial court’s inquiry of the defendant regarding her waiver of counsel satisfied the requirements of G.S. 15A-1242 and the pro se defendant’s failure to comply with Rule 4 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure did not warrant dismissal of her appeal State v. [read post]