Search for: "State v. Daniel"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 5,630
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
"An employee's probationary appointment may be terminated without a hearing for any reason or no reason at all, so long as the termination was not in bad faith or for an improper or impermissible reason" (Matter of Messenger v State of New York Dept. of Corr. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:49 am
En cuanto al mandato constitucional sobre fianza no excesiva, el informe positivo puntualiza e intenta adoptar lo resuelto en Hodgdon v United States, 365 F. 2d 679 (1966), que es un caso del Octavo Circuito que establece que una fianza no es inconstitucional sólo porque el imputado no puede prestarla por razón de falta de recursos. [read post]
28 May 2015, 2:29 pm
Daubert v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks back at last month’s argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
1 Sep 2020, 10:22 am
[v] Alex Merritt & Daniel Maroon, COVID-19 Impacts: California Governor Newsom’s Executive Order Explained (Apr. 8, 2020). [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:32 am
ESPN, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 10:35 pm
Barrett Prettyman, Shawn Francis Peters, Gathie Barnett Edmonds, Marie Barnett Snodgrass & Bennett Boskey, Recollections of West Virginia State Board of Education V. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 2:00 am
For those interested in the quotation of Daniel Webster above, see State v. [read post]
31 Dec 2020, 3:58 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:13 am
” Under the LLC statutes in New York and most other states, except as otherwise provided in the operating agreement, LLC membership interests are freely assignable in whole or in part. [read post]
1 May 2020, 4:24 am
This judgment - [2020] EWHC 713 (Ch) - was handed down remotely by Mr Daniel Alexander QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge in the England and Wales High Court, under the new Covid-19 protocol. [read post]
24 Mar 2020, 3:52 am
” In Kahler v. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 10:30 pm
In Canada (Prime Minister) v. [read post]
31 Oct 2015, 6:48 am
He suggested that Clapper v. [read post]
14 May 2022, 8:30 am
"); State v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am
In a recent decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 11:01 am
In a recent decision – Commonwealth v. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 1:52 pm
The civil lawsuit, Beaty, et al. v. [read post]
23 Sep 2019, 3:25 am
Daniel gave the early morning capacity crowd a quick update on the Brexit state of play, distinguishing between political uncertainty (playing out just a stones’ throw away from the conference center on the steps of the Supreme Court) and legal uncertainty, which was the topic for the morning’s discussion before handing it over to the panellists. [read post]
