Search for: "State v. May"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 120,136
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2019, 10:01 am
In Clinton v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 1:29 pm
By: Jason Rantanen Fujitsu Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 4:53 am
The first is how law firms may charge clients in a charging lien or a fee claim for fixed monthly electronic research costs, the second is an application of account stated, and the third is an analysis of a Judiciary Law 487 counterclaim. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 9:07 am
Mullins v. [read post]
26 May 2020, 3:20 pm
— State of Maryland v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 6:00 am
In United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 12:50 pm
EPA, the standing requirements to challenge a federal agency action may be easier to meet than standing requirements generally.This issue arose in the oral argument when AEP’s attorney, Sidley Austin’s Peter Keisler, was asked whether Mass v. [read post]
10 Jan 2010, 1:03 pm
May 20, 2009)Remanded for reconsideration in light of State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 9:13 am
In Hensley v. [read post]
4 Dec 2015, 11:18 am
They include Kirkham v. [read post]
26 Mar 2004, 10:24 am
Friday's Boston Globe reports that notices has been sent to town and city clerks in Massachusetts advising them of training sessions for the issuance of same-sex marriage licences in early May, prior to the date of May 17 when the first state-authorized same-sex marriages licenses in the US are set to be issued pursuant to the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court ruling in Goodridge v. [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 7:00 am
Teleflex Patent from KSR v Teleflex In KSR v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 9:00 pm
L.A. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 9:01 pm
In Boerne v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 9:03 pm
This posting was written by Jody Coultas, Contributor to Wolters Kluwer Antitrust Law Daily.A gun dealer failed to state Sherman Act, Section 1 or Lanham Act commercial disparagement claims against the Village of Norridge, Illinois, stemming from a change in an ordinance that may force the gun dealer to close up shop, according to the federal district court in Chicago (Kole v. [read post]
27 Mar 2009, 5:23 am
At Monday's oral argument in Yeager v. [read post]
21 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Hampton v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:36 am
The federal Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act basically says that the state can't burden religious practices for people in an "institution" -- e.g., a prison. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:00 am
The State Legislature in August 2011 amended Civil Service Law §167.8 to provide that “The president [of the Civil Service Commission], with the approval of the director of the budget, may extend the modified state cost of premium or subscription charges for employees or retirees** not subject to an agreement referenced above and shall promulgate the necessary rules or regulations to implement this provision. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 2:33 pm
This case may be headed in a s [read post]
