Search for: "State v. Miller"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 5,185
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Aug 2020, 1:14 pm
Prohibition Against Mandatory Life Sentences for Juveniles In Miller v. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 6:11 am
In a New Jersey case, a very different result -- the state supreme court held that the state’s constitution requires a warrant. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 10:47 am
Attorney Ryan McCabe recently discussed United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2011, 9:48 pm
In the 2009 case Wyeth v. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 8:46 am
In Buford v. [read post]
12 Mar 2017, 5:03 pm
Panopticon has examined the judgements in the cases of Ittihadieh v 5-11 Cheyne Gardens & Ors and Deer v Oxford University. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 9:01 pm
In the space below, we offer some unconventional thoughts about the highly-anticipated Sebelius v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 11:08 am
State, 901 N.Y.S.2d 902 (N.Y. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 4:43 am
Miller, 687 F.3d 199 (U.S. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 1:18 pm
Building on its decision in Miller v. [read post]
29 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
In the space below, I provide a brief summary of the United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 1:20 am
Per Masters v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:01 pm
But an even bigger development (that I shall elaborate in the space below) turns out to be an action not by an elected state legislature, but instead by the Supreme Court in last month’s ruling in Arizona Legislature v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
The defendant in State v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:51 am
” Judge Miller cited United States v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Pineda-Moreno, a Ninth Circuit case that could play a significant role in determining how broadly the Supreme Court's recent GPS tracking decision, United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2023, 9:53 am
A few years after deciding Pennsylvania Coal, the Supreme Court returned to regulatory takings with Miller v. [read post]
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
Henry v. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:48 am
Here, the court disagreed, quoting Miller v. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 11:50 am
Planning and Conservation League, et al v. [read post]
