Search for: "State v. Register"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 13,695
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2017, 8:42 am
The state knows about these effects and does [wait for it] nothing! [read post]
23 Jun 2023, 8:42 am
As Justice Kagan stated: “This case is about dog toys and whiskey, two words seldom appearing in the same sentence. [read post]
31 Jul 2007, 11:53 am
In State v. [read post]
11 Oct 2020, 8:28 pm
Strom or to registered nurses. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 11:52 am
In light of the decision in Loving et al v Commissioner where the court ruled that the Internal Revenue Service did not have the authority to regulate tax preparers, the IRS has issued the following statement: As of Friday, Jan. 18, 2013, the United States District Court for the District of Columbia has enjoined the Internal Revenue Service from enforcing the regulatory requirements for registered tax return preparers. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 9:45 am
The Supreme Court upheld Japanese internment in Korematsu v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
STATE v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:41 am
The decision explores the contours of the US Supreme Court’s holding in Morrison v. [read post]
21 May 2009, 4:44 am
Omega affixed a symbol to its watches that it later registered under the Copyright Act in order to claim that, as foreign manufactured goods, under the rationale set forth in Quality King Distribs., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Mar 2015, 8:55 am
Michigan v. [read post]
16 Sep 2022, 9:25 am
The court in CCC 56 v. [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 10:25 am
Most of these events are open to the general public, though those that are starred are only open to those who register to participate in the conference in question. [read post]
13 Dec 2013, 5:01 am
The decisionThe IPO’s decision focused on the words of section 3(1)(b) of the Trade Marks Act 1994, which states that “trade marks which are devoid of any distinctive character” -- an absolute bar to registration that comes from Article 3(1)(b) of the Trade Mark Directive and is paralleled in Article 7(1)(b) of the Community Trade Mark Regulation.The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in Case C-37/03 BioID v OHIM stated that the various… [read post]
8 Aug 2021, 11:55 am
Bad faith pursuant to Article 59(1)(b) of the EU Trade Mark Regulation (EUTMR), presupposes the presence of a dishonest state of mind or intention (Koton Mağazacilik Tekstil Sanayi ve Ticaret v EUIPO (C‑104/18 P)). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
In Maier, it was stated: “[78] … the court must then consider a notional and fair use of that mark in relation to all of the goods or services in respect of which it is registered. [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 3:17 am
The driver of the car was resident in Germany, and had third-party insurance with the German-registered respondent company. [read post]
9 Sep 2012, 2:25 pm
In Mortimer v. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:30 am
Justice Muise of the Supreme Court of Nova Scotia recently released his reasons in McIntosh v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
(b) The arbitrators shall deliver a copy of the award to each party personally, by registered or certified mail, or as provided in the agreement. [read post]
13 Dec 2011, 12:23 pm
” Those provisions included requirements that the offer or sale of any franchise “in this state” must be registered in the state and that any franchise broker selling or offering a franchise “in this state” must register with the state. [read post]