Search for: "State v. Sample"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 4,175
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2011, 5:00 pm
" 49 CFR § 26.53 (b)(2)(v). [read post]
25 Mar 2008, 12:17 pm
[v] U.S. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 7:20 am
United States (1998, in which Justice Breyer wrote for the majority) that first advanced the constitutional theory adopted by the Court in Apprendi v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 11:10 pm
Now we know, it’s a myth (IPKat) United States US General Are you small, American, IP-ish and in business? [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 am
Newman v. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
14 Nov 2011, 10:08 am
Aviva Sports, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
13 Jan 2023, 4:10 pm
UgandaUnwanted Witness-Uganda v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 4:34 am
In KSR v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 3:03 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
23 Mar 2019, 2:15 pm
Judge Gergel did not report whether Jewell’s reported p-value of 0.0654, was one- or two-sided, but he did state that the attained probability “indicates a lack of statistical significance. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 7:53 am
State v. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 7:08 am
United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Here are some sample rule statements: “Once the defense of qualified immunity has been asserted, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating that (1) the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am
The expression ‘P=.05’ means that there is one chance in twenty that a result showing increased risk was caused by a sampling error—i.e., that the randomly selected sample accidentally turned out to be so unrepresentative that it falsely indicates an elevated risk. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 4:30 am
Well Marie-Andree cited that 1879 case Feist Publications, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm
The Brady Rule came out of the Brady v. [read post]
