Search for: "State v. Sample" Results 3041 - 3060 of 4,110
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am by Matthew Ackerman
 Here are some sample rule statements: “Once the defense of qualified immunity has been asserted, the plaintiff has the burden of demonstrating that (1) the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 8:25 am by Schachtman
The expression ‘P=.05’ means that there is one chance in twenty that a result showing increased risk was caused by a sampling error—i.e., that the randomly selected sample accidentally turned out to be so unrepresentative that it falsely indicates an elevated risk. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:21 am by Yvonne Daly
This decision, Damache v DPP [2012] IESC 11 (discussed here), found that s.29(1) of the Offences Against the State Act 1939, which had been in operation for the past 36 years having been inserted by s.5 of the Criminal Law Act 1976, was contrary to the Constitution. [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
The second touches on the nature of the rights of individuals and is rooted in international law (and sometimes domestic constitutional law) defining the scope of the human rights of individuals and the consequential obligations of states and legal persons. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 7:40 am
Louis Vuitton v Nadia Plesner). [read post]
20 May 2025, 8:17 am by Phil Dixon
Cases of potential interest to state practitioners are summarized monthly. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 3:59 pm
Plummer recently stated that "I have so many teams back out of deals for so many reasons, how could I ever prove that DNA testing was one of them? [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 6:16 pm by admin
The Brady Rule came out of the Brady v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 5:22 pm by Russell Knight
Instead the sample QILDRO order leaves the math up to the parties. [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 4:41 pm
  The first is the filing of a lawsuit in federal court by the Governor of Missouri against the People's Republic of China, the Chinese Communist Party and other organs (Missouri v, People's Republic of China). [read post]
21 Apr 2020, 5:45 am by Guest Author for TradeSecretsLaw.com
Myriad Genetics, Supreme Court of the United States, June 13, 2013, No. 12–398 [3] Alice Corporation Pty Ltd. v. [read post]