Search for: "U. S. v. Mays" Results 3041 - 3060 of 7,529
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2017, 7:30 am by Josh Blackman
Yesterday, thirteen judges of the Fourth Circuit sitting en banc heard argument in IRAP v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 7:19 am by John Elwood
Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
7 May 2017, 4:27 pm by Lyle Denniston
Al-Nashiri’s main claim is that the commission has no authority over him because the U,S. [read post]
2 May 2017, 5:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Hearsay testimony may be admitted in evidence in an administrative hearingDemas v City of New York, 2017 NY Slip Op 03267, Appellate Division, First DepartmentA coach [Coach] of a school basketball team filed an Article 78 petition challenging the unsatisfactory performance rating (U-Rating) he received for the 2012-2013 school year. [read post]
1 May 2017, 5:00 am by Mike Madison
One of the paradigm examples of “continuity v. change” in The Innovator’s Dilemma, and the example whose aftermath I’ve witnessed for the last 20 years, is the integrated structural steel industry in the US, headquartered in Pittsburgh. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Frank Santoro
We can speculate that there may have been a bit of that going on with the parties involved in Gersh v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 7:00 am by Frank Santoro
We can speculate that there may have been a bit of that going on with the parties involved in Gersh v. [read post]
28 Apr 2017, 5:20 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Determining an appropriate disciplinary penalty "under the circumstances"King v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03098, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentFigueroa v New York State Off. of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse Servs., 2017 NY Slip Op 03104, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentAs the Court of Appeals explained in Pell v Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1 of Towns of Scarsdale and… [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 10:33 am by Jenny Gesley
The underlying purpose is for the president to address any urgency that may occur when parliament is not in session. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 8:59 am by John Elwood
” Thanks to Bryan U. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 4:56 am by SHG
S. ___ (2015) (per curiam); Taylor v. [read post]