Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 10,389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 May 2012, 12:53 am
Much discussion ensued over the course of the conference about the U.S. doctrine of functionality, and as if on cue, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals (this Kat’s home Court) has given us more wax to chew on on the issue in the case of Maker’s Mark v. [read post]
12 May 2015, 10:58 am
See United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 12:16 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
14 Sep 2007, 10:42 am
McZeal v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 10:09 am
In United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 1:47 am
Rule of Reason curbs Basic Instinct as trade mark loses its appealCase C-400/14 P Basic AG Lebensmittelhandel v OHIM), Repsol YPF SA intervening see the Court of Justice of the European Union dealing with the conflict of two figurative marks containing the word "basic". [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 3:28 am
In the ABA Journal, Mark Walsh previews next month’s oral arguments in the cellphone privacy cases, United States v. [read post]
21 Jan 2010, 4:30 am
The Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Anastasio v. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 4:00 am
Status of a spouse named as the primary beneficiary of a life insurance policy or similar instrument in the event the marriage is terminated by divorceSveen, et el v Melin, United State Supreme Court, 584 U.S. ___ (Decided June 11, 2018)Mark Sveen purchased a life insurance policy, naming his then spouse, Kaye Melin, as the primary beneficiary and designating his two children from a prior marriage, Ashley and Antone Sveen, as contingent beneficiaries. [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) granted an all-time high 219,614 United States utility patents in 2010 – up 31 percent over 2009. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:37 am
See United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 7:38 am
See United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 10:03 am
The Court has already held that states have positive obligations to protect children from sexual abuse and corporal punishment from their parents (Z v United Kingdom (2002) and A v United Kingdom (1998), for example) and so the integrity of this public/private dividing line is not in issue, but whether it will be pierced from a gender perspective remains to be seen. [read post]
3 Nov 2012, 8:44 am
During its 2011-2012 term, the United States Supreme Court issued momentous decisions regarding health care, immigration, and the death penalty. [read post]
2 May 2011, 1:30 pm
" Citing: United Transp. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 1:04 am
United States
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:25 am
COURT OF APPEALS, SECOND CIRCUITCriminal Practice
Court Need Not Consider Disparities Between Federal, State Penalties When Sentencing Federal Defendant
United States v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 12:43 pm
In Joy Zinante v. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:36 am
We, the jury from the United States v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 6:13 am
Kennedy, (5th Cir., April 2, 2013), the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals concluded that the state of Texas had failed to adequately justify under RLUIPA its policy of prohibiting prisoners from wearing beards for religious reasons.In United States v. [read post]
