Search for: "United States v. Younge"
Results 3041 - 3060
of 3,946
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
– Discussion of IPFrontline.com article ‘Understanding Intellectual Property Value’: (IP finance), How to make sure your IP strategy plan is not doomed to failure: (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Improve venture capital returns with IP portfolio management: (Ezine @rticles) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands Trade mark strategy – counterintuitive names: (IP Thinktank), ICANN Intellectual Property Constituency paper on sunrise mechanisms for… [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 11:00 am
But might So might one describe pre-2022 MLB as a form of “federalism” in which constituent units, each with their own measure of “sovereignty” were entitled to make their own rules, at least up to a point? [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 5:40 am
There have even been some lawsuits, including this one recently filed in United States Eastern District Court, State Farm v. [read post]
1 Jul 2010, 8:41 pm
It is hardly news to anyone in the United States that fireworks are associated with a proper celebration of July 4th. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 7:42 am
The CA is similar to the Sherman Antitrust and Clayton Act in the United States. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 5:43 am
Perhaps the most significant concern is the risk that the United States will unintentionally slide into war or escalate a conflict. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:56 am
The persistent vegetative state was an important issue in the 1990 United States Supreme Court case of Cruzan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 5:30 am
United States, which declared unconstitutional provisions of the Brady Act. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 8:58 am
Additionally, at least seven district courts permitted judicial participation by local rules until the [United States v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 1:52 pm
Circuit pointedly observed in its seminal decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2015, 6:34 am
He considered (applying PG v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 51) that REP was a significant but not necessarily conclusive factor in deciding whether Article 8 was engaged. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 4:40 pm
He considered (applying PG v United Kingdom (2008) 46 EHRR 51) that REP was a significant but not necessarily conclusive factor in deciding whether Article 8 was engaged. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:01 pm
Norquist states that his pledge is self-enforcing—”candidates and incumbents solemnly bind themselves”—but in a leading case cited in the Standler essay (above), Schaefer v. [read post]
2 Feb 2016, 9:45 am
State of Maryland). [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
The answer was easy: “The United States must lead by the power of our example and not by the example of our power. [read post]
12 Sep 2022, 7:23 pm
Qualified Immunity In 1989, the United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
26 Aug 2023, 4:05 am
United StatesBurton v. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:48 am
The “FDA is a regulatory agency whose mandate is to control which drugs are marketed in the United States and how they are marketed. [read post]
24 Aug 2011, 7:27 pm
As the recent opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces in United States v. [read post]
