Search for: "Degree v. United States"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 6,534
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Feb 2021, 9:05 pm
Robbins and Chevron v. [read post]
10 Dec 2013, 3:27 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 10:50 am
Answer: Because of the effect on “further appellate review” – which means the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Mar 2008, 1:02 am
United States, holding that the government had failed to establish the existence of a tax deficiency. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 10:45 am
" CJLF has also filed an amicus curiae brief in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:29 am
Becker, [1980] 2 S.C.R.834 and Kerr v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 11:47 am
Criminal law -- Sentencing -- Holding of United States Supreme Court in Graham v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 6:18 pm
We therefore reverse the grant of summaryjudgment for Sunovion.Of public useAn applicant may not receive a patent for an inventionthat was “in public use . . . in this country, more thanone year prior to the date of the application for patent inthe United States. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 8:34 am
First up was United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2010, 4:28 am
Although a number of collective bargaining agreements provide for a shorter “statutes of limitations” for filing disciplinary charges against an individual in a collective bargaining unit, it is unlikely that setting a greater statute of limitations for employees in a collective bargaining unit would survive judicial review for the reason set out by the Appellate Division in City of Plattsburgh v Local 788, 108 AD2d 1045 -- a collective bargaining agreement may… [read post]
7 Dec 2015, 4:09 am
Keel v. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 8:22 pm
In United States v. [read post]
13 May 2014, 7:50 pm
And, like the others, she relied to a considerable degree on the reasoning of the Supreme Court last June in United States v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 5:33 am
Dodd, 598 F.3d 449, 452–53 (U.S.Court of Appeals for the 8th Circuit 2010)); see also United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 6:33 pm
v=mUZ6U-Wasd4 The H-1B cap season is now in full swing. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 6:29 am
United States, which will be argued this morning. [read post]
26 Aug 2013, 8:52 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California denied Sequenom’s motion for a preliminary injunction to prevent Ariosa from making, using, or selling that test. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 5:37 am
v Bettenhauser, 95 NY2d 185, 188; see State Farm Fire & Cas. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 11:36 am
CIVIL ACTION NO. 11-6083 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA 2012 U.S. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
