Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 7,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Oct 2016, 6:37 am
Two recent English cases, Karen Millen v Karen Millen Fashions Ltd and Skyscape Cloud Services Ltd v Sky Plc, indirectly consider Declarations of Non-Infringement in relation to Trade Marks. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 9:04 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 6:12 pm
Ed. 2d 973 (1980); Levine v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 5:14 am
As such, PRS and QA both have a close and genuine link to their home state. [read post]
28 Aug 2015, 6:45 pm
The court may declare ineligible to act as fiduciary a person unable to read and write the English language. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 11:39 am
It lays down the fundamental structure and essential values of the state. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 4:08 pm
Following the publications complained of he felt compelled to, and did, make a formal announcement as to his true state of health both to the Board of the Company and to its workforce [43]. [read post]
19 Jul 2021, 1:00 am
This appeal will consider whether the UK Government has recognised Interim President Guaidó as Head of State of Venezuela and, if so, whether any challenge to the validity of Mr Guaidó’s appointments to the Board of the Central Bank of Venezuela is justiciable in an English court. [read post]
28 Nov 2014, 9:03 pm
Arguing for a Pennsylvania man in the case of Elonis v. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 5:08 am
There is no “federal common law,” and adopting English common law would have been up to the individual states. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:35 am
This blog’s Amy Howe provides the Plain English versions of the Court’s decisions this week in Judulang v. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 10:15 am
Of the question: Did the Supreme Court Rule in Stanford v. [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 2:53 am
The application was refused on two grounds: first, "it is not, in the state of English law now, arguable that the unqualified right to possession by a landlord is incompatible with Article 8; or indeed, in the light of Sheffield CC v Smart [2002] HLR 34, with Article 1 Protocol 1 of the Convention" (at [8]); second, the claim was not arguable on the facts of the case in which it appeared to the local authority that the property was vacant, and so could not be… [read post]
6 Dec 2020, 4:19 pm
Hungary v. [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 9:08 am
Toys R Us, Inc. and Taylor v. [read post]
21 Feb 2020, 11:34 am
Toys R Us, Inc. and Taylor v. [read post]
31 Dec 2019, 6:58 am
Lachaux v Independent Print [2019] UKSC 27 The most important English libel judgment of the year. [read post]
24 Jan 2021, 11:01 pm
McLean & V. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 3:35 pm
-------------------*Here's Stevens, from Five Chiefs: A Supreme Court Memoir explaining how he concluded that the death penalty is now unconstitutional - a conclusion he stated in Baze v. [read post]
