Search for: "ENGLISH v. STATE"
Results 3061 - 3080
of 6,455
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Sep 2022, 12:18 pm
” United States v. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 10:16 am
The CJEU has ruled that Member States must be recognised as having “some discretion” in that respect. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 3:27 pm
The case is Health Freedom Defense Fund, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 11:39 pm
Firearms, Self-Defense and Militias in Pre-Revolutionary AmericaThe Boston Massacre TrialA Colonial View of the English Right to ArmsE.A. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 12:22 pm
Court of Appeal recently held in Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc. [read post]
2 Oct 2011, 12:59 pm
Court of Appeal recently held in Mobile Telesystems Finance SA v Nomihold Securities Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 4:00 am
Bruen is quite simply a national nightmare.In United States v. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 11:17 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in State of Haryana v. [read post]
13 Mar 2014, 1:43 pm
The court stated in its judgment that DMG relied in particular on Jameel v Dow Jones & Co Inc [2005] EWCA Civ 75.In Jameel Lord Phillips MR stated [at 54]:“An abuse of process is of concern not merely to the parties but to the court. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
The Supreme Court has taken the view in Actavis v Eli Lilly that there is a law of equivalents - that's what the EPC says, and that must be adopted in English law. [read post]
13 May 2014, 9:23 am
Here Arnold J stated that proceedings requesting a DNI in relation to both a UK and foreign designations of a European patent could be brought before English courts also considering that the plaintiffs undertook not to challenge validity of the patent at issue.According to the Court of Genoa, Italian (and more at large: European) courts may hear DNI claims only when the issue of validity of the patent is not raised by way of an action or as a defence. [read post]
14 Jun 2018, 5:07 pm
See City of Rolling Meadows v. [read post]
14 May 2013, 8:05 am
The only European authority on "staple commercial products" cited was a Patents County Court decision in Pavel v Sony Corporation where HHJ Ford stated that a "staple commercial product is a commodity or raw material". [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 12:28 am
The last case awarding damages in this region was in 2013 where the false allegation of human trafficking was made by the Defendants (Al-Amoudi v Kifle and another [2013] EWHC 293 (QB)). [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 2:17 pm
EEOC v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
24 Jul 2012, 8:18 am
See DeJames v. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 11:03 am
Shapiro v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 11:00 am
We can find docket information for Hotze v. [read post]
